Everyone’s favorite security guru has a great blog post on how to prevent loss of an expensive camera that must be checked luggage rather than carry on. To summarize, you can pack it with a starter pistol so that the TSA takes extra precautions to prevent it’s loss (they don’t want to loose a gun, but don’t mind losing your expensive possessions).
This is really quite brilliant. Here’s some info on requirements. According to this you could also just carry a replica, or even bullet, or a piece of a gun.
That’s got to be the most clever solution to the problem. Finally we can all carry our laptops and expensive equipment around without fear of loss. You know the TSA won’t loose a gun, since that would spark a major controversy.
I must admit this solution is beyond clever, it’s outright brilliant.
Of course when the Federal Government uses the legal equivalent to the Atomic Bomb, you know (despite their insistence) that all of the alleged activity is true… otherwise they would defend it. They even went as far as stating:
The fact that the United States will assert the state secrets privilege should not be construed as a confirmation or denial of any of plaintiffs’ allegations, either about AT&T or the alleged surveillance activities.
Yea sure. You don’t invoke something like this when you have nothing to hide. It’s like how all those companies “settle” but don’t admit guilt or wrongdoing. You don’t pay for something you didn’t do.
By the way, if you traceroute to this website and see “att.com” anywhere in there, you can rest assured they know your reading this ;-).
Wow. Now George Clooney must be thrilled that there’s someone else who looks more pathetic than him in the uniform.
How pathetic…. yet hysterical.
You have to wonder about this guy. The FBI claims that he hates homosexuals, jews, abortions, and a whole long list of things. Now look at this photo:
That isn’t ironic is it? Especially considering he has (I believe) a Jewish lawyer, yet hates jews. He must be a deeply repressed homosexual jew.