Google Gears

In case you were wondering what Google Gears meant to the planned support for Offline Web Applications in Firefox 3.0, here’s an article you may be interested in. No definitive answers, but does mention the possibility of combining ideas.

Google Gears is pretty cool, but I’d be much more comfortable if Google submitted the API as part of WHATWG and it were standardized. Google Gears would then be the way to use it without a browser having native support. I personally don’t like the idea of competing implementations.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Posts

Related Posts


2 Responses to “Google Gears”

  1. […] Via Robert Accetura’s Fun With Wordage. […]

  2. Peter Kasting says:

    Google has already been in communication with the WHATWG about Gears and is working to try and get it standardized in exactly the way you suggest.

    Still, ad hoc standardization is faster, easier, and nonblocking to formal standardization. So I see no downside to releasing Gears as-is. This way field testing will help inform the implementation before it’s enshrined in a standard.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.