<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Accettura&#039;s Fun With Wordage &#187; norton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/tag/norton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://robert.accettura.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='robert.accettura.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Norton AntiVirus 2009</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/13/norton-antivirus-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/13/norton-antivirus-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton-antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I installed Norton AntiVirus 2009. I&#8217;ve got a 3 CPU license and installed on two computer thus far. My initial feeling about it is that it&#8217;s vastly improved from 2008, and light years ahead of the clusterfuck that was the &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/13/norton-antivirus-2009/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed <a href="http://www.symantec.com/norton/antivirus">Norton AntiVirus 2009</a>.  I&#8217;ve got a 3 CPU license and installed on two computer thus far.  My initial feeling about it is that it&#8217;s vastly improved from 2008, and light years ahead of the clusterfuck that was the early 00&#8242;s.  It&#8217;s been vastly better for about 2 years now, 2008 is a significant but still incremental improvement.  2005 was the bottom.</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20091002_norton2009_cpu.gif" alt="Norton 2009 CPU monitor" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2048" />The install itself was very quick (yay) which was a positive sign.  It seems to be using less processes and less memory than any recent version.  A very welcome sight.</p>
<p>Another noteworthy item is that the application itself is faster.  The UI loads quickly and feels rather responsive.  In previous years there was a several second lag.  This is clearly gone.  Scanning is also quicker.</p>
<p>Another interesting thing is that LiveUpdate was apparently fixed so that it no longer launches a dozen child processes when it runs.  I haven&#8217;t looked too closely but I&#8217;ve yet to see this behavior when it runs.  I think this was the single most annoying thing about 2008.</p>
<p>Symantec even went as far as putting a CPU monitor on the application itself to show how much CPU they are occupying.  That itself is a pretty bold move considering their past history of bloat.  Clearly this year they are trying to undo that reputation.  Their website is updated to discuss <a href="http://www.symantec.com/norton/new/fast/index.jsp">performance</a> now.</p>
<p>The big feature is that Symantec now feeds updates every few minutes rather than daily.  This is a good move considering the fast pace of security threats these days.  The UI even shows the seconds since the last update.  It&#8217;s great to finally see this.</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/20091002_norton2009_updates.gif" alt="Norton 2009 Update Frequency" class="centered size-full wp-image-2049" /></p>
<p>For anyone ever upgrading a Symantec product, here&#8217;s a bit of advice.  Uninstall the previous version, restart, then run the <a href="http://service1.symantec.com/Support/tsgeninfo.nsf/docid/2005033108162039">Norton Removal Tool (NRT)</a> and restart again.  This will give you a much cleaner base than just installing and hoping for the best.  Then finally install and follow directions.  This has proven to be much better than any other method.  AntiVirus software hooks just dig so deep into the OS that any other method just seems doomed to fail.</p>
<p>I should also note that it scans <em>all volumes</em>.  This could be a bad thing if you have network volumes loaded.  Make sure to exclude those if this is a problem.</p>
<h4>Amazon</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001E7788K?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=accettura-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B001E7788K">Norton Antivirus 2009</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001E792A2?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=accettura-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B001E792A2">Norton Antivirus 2009 CD 3 User Ret</a><br />
<a href="http://images.frys.com/art/rebates_pdf/5723572_123109.pdf">$20 Rebate</a> (Expires 12/31/09) &#8211; should work with purchases from most stores including Amazon, despite being hosted on Fry&#8217;s.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2047#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2008/10/a501beb.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/13/norton-antivirus-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norton 360</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/02/26/norton-360/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/02/26/norton-360/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 03:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/02/26/norton-360/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting review of Norton 360 was posted by CNet. Overall the review was very positive, they seem to like it. Interesting to me was: We also found that Norton 360 is optimized for Internet Explorer only, and not Firefox &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/02/26/norton-360/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/Norton_360/4505-3667_7-32330411.html?subj=fdba%E2%88%82=rss&#038;tag=MR_Search+Results">review of Norton 360</a> was posted by CNet.  Overall the review was very positive, they seem to like it.  Interesting to me was:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://reviews.cnet.com/Norton_360/4505-3667_7-32330411.html?subj=fdba%E2%88%82=rss&#038;tag=MR_Search+Results"><p>We also found that Norton 360 is optimized for Internet Explorer only, and not Firefox and Opera browsers. It could be said that Symantec realizes that Internet Explorer users need more protection, but it would be nice to use the antiphishing feature in Norton 360 on Firefox or Opera. Of the three super suites, only McAfee supports Firefox; none support Opera. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know if support is planned through an extension or not.  They could potentially leverage <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Adding_phishing_protection_data_providers">existing infrastructure</a> to do the job quite nicely.  I&#8217;m not sure if anyone has used this functionality to date.  As far as I&#8217;m aware nobody has.  Not even <a href="http://www.phishtank.com/">PhishTank</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still not sure if Norton 360 is really a product I&#8217;d be interested in.  I use Norton AV, and despite a few small things, it&#8217;s a pretty solid product.  I&#8217;m not really sure I see the added stuff in 360 as something beneficial.  But I still have a little while on my subscription for the year, so I don&#8217;t have to decide just yet.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/02/26/norton-360/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2007/02/4476b92.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/02/26/norton-360/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Norton AntiVirus With POP3 Over SSL</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stunnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t find this anywhere online, so I thought I&#8217;d post it. Norton AntiVirus up to and including 2007 doesn&#8217;t support POP3 over SSL. That&#8217;s a problem since sending mail without SSL is insecure, and sending mail over SSL with &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t find this anywhere online, so I thought I&#8217;d post it.  Norton AntiVirus up to and including 2007 doesn&#8217;t support POP3 over SSL.  That&#8217;s a problem since sending mail without SSL is insecure, and sending mail over SSL with no virus scanning is also insecure.  There is a fix.</p>
<p><em>Please note these directions, and intended to be a casual guide for experienced individuals.  I&#8217;m not providing assistance or support.</em></p>
<p><span id="more-1272"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Download <a href="http://www.stunnel.org/download/">stunnel</a> and install it.</li>
<li>Open up the <code>stunnel.conf</code> file (either through the Start Menu &#8212;> Stunnel &#8212;> Edit stunnel.conf, or navigate to the file yourself.</li>
<li>For each mail server you use, create an entry as follows.  Replace mail.myisp.com with your mail server.  Also make sure you set the appropriate port (995 is typically fine).  Make sure the accept port is different for each one.
<pre>
client=yes
accept=127.0.0.1:110
connect=mail.myisp.com:995
</pre>
</li>
<li>Start Menu &#8212;> Stunnel &#8212;> Service install</li>
<li>Start Menu &#8212;> Stunnel &#8212;> Service start</li>
<li>Now configure your email client to use the following information:
<pre>
Server: localhost
Port: 110 (or whatever port that account was set to use up above)
</pre>
<p>SSL should be <em>off</em> (the SSL connection is now terminated at stunnel, which uses the local loopback interface to send mail to your mail client on port 110.  So mail is sent over the web in SSL, but locally in plain text (where an AV can sniff it).</p>
</li>
<li>Test it out.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Important Last step</strong></p>
<p>Up to now it should be working, but it&#8217;s using a generic key.  This means everyone who downloads stunnel has the key.  You need your own.  There are good directions for that from <a href="http://www.stunnel.org/faq/certs.html#ToC5">available here</a>.  You can create one with a copy of <a href="http://www.openssl.org/">OpenSSL</a> (it&#8217;s up to you to get it for Windows, or hop on a Unix box for this step).  I should note that the <code>stunnel.cnf</code> file is missing in the Windows binaries as of Stunnel 4.20 (don&#8217;t ask me why).  If your going to gen a key on windows use the following in a text file named <code>stunnel.cnf</code>:</p>
<pre>
# create RSA certs - Server

RANDFILE = stunnel.rnd

[ req ]
default_bits = 1024
encrypt_key = yes
distinguished_name = req_dn
x509_extensions = cert_type

[ req_dn ]
countryName = Country Name (2 letter code)
countryName_default             = PL
countryName_min                 = 2
countryName_max                 = 2

stateOrProvinceName             = State or Province Name (full name)
stateOrProvinceName_default     = Some-State

localityName                    = Locality Name (eg, city)

0.organizationName              = Organization Name (eg, company)
0.organizationName_default      = Stunnel Developers Ltd

organizationalUnitName          = Organizational Unit Name (eg, section)
#organizationalUnitName_default =

0.commonName                    = Common Name (FQDN of your server)
0.commonName_default            = localhost

# To create a certificate for more than one name uncomment:
# 1.commonName                  = DNS alias of your server
# 2.commonName                  = DNS alias of your server
# ...
# See http://home.netscape.com/eng/security/ssl_2.0_certificate.html
# to see how Netscape understands commonName.

[ cert_type ]
nsCertType = server
</pre>
<p><small>This is from the source code of version 4.20.</small></p>
<p>From there you can effectively use the following commands (from the above linkage):</p>
<pre>
openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -nodes -config stunnel.cnf -out stunnel.pem -keyout stunnel.pem
</pre>
<p>Change 365 to something higher if you don&#8217;t want to do this on a yearly basis.  Though may not be a bad idea to do annually.  Answer the prompts as required.  Make sure the Common Name is set to &#8220;localhost&#8221;.</p>
<p>Followed by:</p>
<pre>
openssl gendh 512 >> stunnel.pem
</pre>
<p>Make sure your cert.pem is in your stunnel directory, stop the service and start it again.  From now on you should be good to go.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s it.  Now you have SSL encrypted mail connections, with support for AntiVirus scanning.  This will work for any mail host that uses POP3 over SSL including Gmail.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2007/01/7810ccd.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norton &#8220;Internet Worm Protection&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pptp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vpn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Norton AntiVirus has this strange omission I just can&#8217;t figure out. For some reason &#8220;Internet Worm Protection&#8221; won&#8217;t allow for creating a connection to a PPTP VPN. Not very helpful if you have to connect to one of the many &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norton AntiVirus has this strange omission I just can&#8217;t figure out.  For some reason &#8220;Internet Worm Protection&#8221; won&#8217;t allow for creating a connection to a PPTP VPN.  Not very helpful if you have to connect to one of the many VPN&#8217;s out there that use this protocol.</p>
<p>First a little primer on making a <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314076">PPTP connection</a> .  You essentially need two ports open, 1723/TCP, and IP Protocol 47 (GRE).  Ok, this is pretty basic stuff.  We can do that <img src='http://robert.accettura.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Well in the little wizard Norton provides, to create a rule you have the following choices for protocol: TCP, UDP, TCP/UDP, ICMP, ICMPv6, All (pointless).  No way to select GRE.</p>
<p>So the only way I&#8217;ve found to connect to a PPTP VPN thus far is simply to disable either just Internet Worm Protection, or disable Norton AV.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s rather odd that something like this is not supported.  A search on Google didn&#8217;t turn up an answer.  Symantec&#8217;s tech support database didn&#8217;t turn up anything helpful either.</p>
<p>I would have expected something like this to function without a hitch.  I&#8217;m very surprised to see this requires any intervention, and even more surprised to see that even with intervention there&#8217;s still no way to get it working.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/10/0f2c9a9.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norton AV 2006 Update</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got Norton AntiVirus 2006 a few weeks ago, and decided today to update 3 systems from 2005 to 2006. It was free (after rebate) so a worthwhile update to keep those virus definitions fresh. One computer had trouble uninstalling, &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got Norton AntiVirus 2006 a few weeks ago, and decided today to update 3 systems from 2005 to 2006.  It was free (after rebate) so a worthwhile update to keep those virus definitions fresh.  </p>
<p>One computer had trouble uninstalling, the old version (2005) then installed fine.  The next system had uninstall problems (but seemed to be a bit different), and failed to install on the first attempt.  The third system is literally brand new so no problems (thankfully).</p>
<p>They used to have a &#8220;removal tool&#8221; online you could download.  In the real world we call it uninstall and include it with software, but they don&#8217;t.  Now instead of a download it&#8217;s ActiveX&#8230; just to make the situation suck slightly more.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve pretty much had it with Symantec.  This took 20X longer than it should have.  You know your product has problems when a customer is unsatisfied with free.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/08/2cbca44.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Apple Worm?</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/03/16/the-apple-trojan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Norton AntiVirus, Apple&#8217;s own QuickTime.com website may be a threat to the safety of my (and your) computer. I was trying to view the M:i:III Trailer (link below in plain text, so you can think twice before clicking). &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Norton AntiVirus, Apple&#8217;s own QuickTime.com website may be a threat to the safety of my (and your) computer.  I was trying to view the M:i:III Trailer (link below in plain text, so you can think twice before clicking).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure who is at fault.  It&#8217;s either Apple with a contaminated server, or Norton who incorrectly pushed a bad Virus definition file out.  Either way it&#8217;s a bad thing.</p>
<p><a id="p1023" rel="attachment" class="imagelink" href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/apple-integer-overflow/" title="Apple Integer Overflow"><img id="image1023" src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/20060316_norton_qt_applet.png" alt="Apple Integer Overflow" class="centered" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Details: Attempted Intrusion &#8220;Apple Quicktime MOV Integer Overflow&#8221; against your machine was detected and blocked.<br />
Intruder: movies.apple.com(62.153.251.222)(http(80)).<br />
Risk Level: Medium.<br />
Protocol: TCP.<br />
Attacked IP: XXX(192.168.xxx.xxx).<br />
Attacked Port: 2499.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The URL in question is (proceed with caution):</p>
<pre>http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/missionimpossibleiii/large.html</pre>
<p>Anyone want to take a guess who is at fault?  This is with Norton 2005 with 3/15/2006 Definitions.</p>
<p><small><strong>Edit [3/16/2006 10:36PM EST]:</strong> Changed title to accurately represent dialog <strike>trojan</strike> <ins>worm</ins>.  Added Norton Version.</small><br />
<small><strong>Edit [3/17/2006 10:58AM EST]:</strong> Symantec <a href="http://news.com.com/Norton+update+kicks+AOL+users+offline/2100-1002_3-6050786.html?tag=nefd.top">acknowleges a problem with AOL</a> in it&#8217;s latest update.</small><br />
<small><strong>Edit [3/19/2006 5:30PM EST]:</strong> An <a href="http://symantec.com/avcenter/attack_sigs/s21535.html">document about the vulnerability</a> (no mention on this bug), and <a href="https://www-secure.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2006.03.15.html">update documentation</a>.</small>
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/03/16/the-apple-trojan/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/03/021bbc7.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Symantec Live Update Fun</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/20/symantec-live-update-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/20/symantec-live-update-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live-update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had Norton SystemWorks 2002 for a while, then upgraded AntiVirus to 2004. Worked fine for quite some time. Recently I reformatted my hard drive and reinstalled this duo. Now I&#8217;m getting an error that I Subscription Client Update failed LU1812. &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/20/symantec-live-update-fun/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had Norton SystemWorks 2002 for a while, then upgraded AntiVirus to 2004.  Worked fine for quite some time.  Recently I reformatted my hard drive and reinstalled this duo.  Now I&#8217;m getting an error that I Subscription Client Update failed LU1812.  I&#8217;ve got no clue why this is happening.  Following Symantec&#8217;s instructions to completely uninstall and reinstall didn&#8217;t work, nor did updating Live Update or any other step they gave.</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/06/20050620_liveupdate.png" alt='Live Update Error' class="centered" /></p>
<p>Curious if anyone else out there ran across this, and if anyone resolved this problem.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=781#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2005/06/7143d7f.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/20/symantec-live-update-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Someone should have used Firefox and Norton AntiVirus</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/11/someone-should-have-used-firefox-and-norton-antivirus/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/11/someone-should-have-used-firefox-and-norton-antivirus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 03:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A heck of a lot cheaper than this. Norton AntiVirus 2005 ($22.99 at time of writing), and Firefox (Free, forever) are not nearly as expensive as that phone bill. It&#8217;s not hard to avoid that situation. It really isn&#8217;t. An &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/11/someone-should-have-used-firefox-and-norton-antivirus/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A heck of a lot cheaper than <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/10/eveningnews/consumer/main701103.shtml">this</a>.  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=accettura-20%26link_code=xm2%26camp=2025%26creative=165953%26path=http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%253fASIN=B0002UCJV6%2526location=/o/ASIN/B0002UCJV6%25253FSubscriptionId=0JA3M3YJ6Z4BPRYKA902" title="View product details at Amazon">Norton AntiVirus 2005</a> ($22.99 at time of writing), and Firefox (Free, forever) are not nearly as expensive as that phone bill.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not hard to avoid that situation.  It really isn&#8217;t.  An 8 year old can do it.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=772#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2005/06/e57c6b9.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/11/someone-should-have-used-firefox-and-norton-antivirus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank you Norton, for wasting an hour of my life</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2004/01/07/thank-you-norton-for-wasting-an-hour-of-my-life/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2004/01/07/thank-you-norton-for-wasting-an-hour-of-my-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live-update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2004/01/07/thank-you-norton-for-wasting-an-hour-of-my-life/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I gave you the best hour of my life! Ok, it wasn&#8217;t that bad. Symantec, apparently deployed a new version of Live Update today, and it apparently wasn&#8217;t well tested. After days of serious virus catches, it updated, and live &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2004/01/07/thank-you-norton-for-wasting-an-hour-of-my-life/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I gave you the best hour of my life!</i></p>
<p>Ok, it wasn&#8217;t that bad.  </p>
<p>Symantec, apparently deployed a new version of Live Update today, and it apparently wasn&#8217;t well tested.  After days of serious virus catches, it updated, and live updated, doesn&#8217;t function.  I uninstall, reinstall, uninstall again, clear registry out a bit, search for files, look in Knowledge Base, reinstall.  I got it working (think they disabled that update for now).</p>
<p>What a mess.</p>
<p>So for any Symantec engineer reading this.  THANK YOU.  That was fun <img src='http://robert.accettura.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Try beta testing next time.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2004/01/07/thank-you-norton-for-wasting-an-hour-of-my-life/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2004/01/f340f1b.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2004/01/07/thank-you-norton-for-wasting-an-hour-of-my-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

