<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Accettura&#039;s Fun With Wordage &#187; mac-mini</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/tag/mac-mini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://robert.accettura.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='robert.accettura.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Mac mini Server</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/10/20/mac-mini-server/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/10/20/mac-mini-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xgrid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve used old Mac&#8217;s as file servers for several years now. They are well-built machines that ship with a tightly integrated UNIX based operating system. Of all the consumer grade hardware/software out there, I think they are by far the &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/10/20/mac-mini-server/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used old Mac&#8217;s as file servers for several years now.  They are well-built machines that ship with a tightly integrated UNIX based operating system.  Of all the consumer grade hardware/software out there, I think they are by far the best equipped for the task.  They are expensive, but the quality is unmatched.</p>
<p>Apple today launched several product refreshes, but the one that really catches my eye is the <a href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/server/">Mac mini server</a>.  It&#8217;s pretty much just a Mac mini with the optical drive replaced with a second SATA 2.5&#8243; hard drive and a copy of Snow Leopard server in place of the standard Mac OS X.</p>
<p>The hardware is pretty uneventful.  People have been swapping drives in the Mac mini for years to add more storage as well as external drives.  Software wise people have been using server products on the mini for some time.  Nothing here is revolutionary.  But marketing the product as a server is for a few reasons:</p>
<h3>Home/Small Business Servers</h3>
<p>Like I said, I&#8217;ve had a home server for years.  It&#8217;s great for backing up and sharing files and printers.  It can also be purposed for a myriad of other tasks.  While you can set this all up on stock Mac OS X, tweaking it all is a little daunting as the Mac OS X UI only exposes the very basics.  Mac OS X server has much deeper integration making it easier for people who don&#8217;t know what they are doing.  I expect we&#8217;ll see some third party products that further expand the use of this in the home and small business market.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to even see some Home theater PC (HTPC) backend solutions. (MythTV anyone?)</p>
<h3>Efficient Servers</h3>
<p>The Mac Mini only consumes 16 watts when idle.  It&#8217;s still a Core 2 Duo 2.53GHz CPU, and ships with 4 GB RAM.  The place it suffers is disk I/O thanks to using 5400 RPM drives (It&#8217;s cost per GB isn&#8217;t that great either thanks to the 2.5&#8243; drives).  In previous models it wasn&#8217;t too difficult to swap the drive with 7200 RPM drives though I don&#8217;t know how the thermals will play out with dual HD&#8217;s.  It may be possible to use software RAID, I&#8217;m not sure what sort of improvement in performance you could get since I don&#8217;t know the details of the motherboard.  However, if you have a task that&#8217;s not IO bound, or you use a NAS via Gigabit Ethernet (or a Firewire/USB drive) it may not matter.  That&#8217;s a pretty affordable low powered node in your grid.  Even better if it could handle higher density RAM to get 8 GB into there via 2 x 4GB SO-DIMMs.</p>
<p>I presume Apple&#8217;s <a href="http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/technology/xgrid.html">Xgrid</a> will work too.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting move, and one that I think could be successful.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2987#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2009/10/ae1d2c2.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/10/20/mac-mini-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MWSF 2009 Predictions</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/02/mwsf-2009-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/02/mwsf-2009-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod-touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mwsf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I play this game every year. I&#8217;m having some trouble with predictions this year since Apple has been somewhat scatterbrained lately. Regardless, here&#8217;s my list for MacWorld 2009: The usual pep-rally &#8211; iPhone App Store is a success, lots of &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/02/mwsf-2009-predictions/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I play this game every year.  I&#8217;m having some trouble with predictions this year since Apple has been somewhat scatterbrained lately.  Regardless, here&#8217;s my list for <a href="http://www.macworldexpo.com/">MacWorld 2009</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The usual pep-rally</strong> &#8211; iPhone App Store is a success, lots of iTunes music download, iPod touch sales strong, Mac sales solid.  Users happy.  (Probability: 100%)
</li>
<li><strong>iTunes DRM Free Content</strong> &#8211; More DRM Free Music.  Much less likely is video.  (Probability: 85%).</li>
<li><strong>17&#8243; Unibody MacBook Pro</strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s missing from the lineup. (Probability: 85%).</li>
<li><strong>iPhone OS 2.3</strong> &#8211; Despite a lack of rumors on the iPhone OS 2.3 unlike previous versions which were more publicity tested I still think we will see an announcement on this front.  Apple promised push notification back in September.  It&#8217;s way overdue.  If it&#8217;s not ready to ship today, I expect Apple will at least give a preview and a date.  I also suspect at least one other headliner feature.  I&#8217;m hoping for Copy&#038;Paste.  (Probability: 80%).</li>
<li><strong>Steve Jobs Health</strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s the elephant in the room.  I suspect whomever holds the keynote will mention it.  Assuming Steve Jobs himself doesn&#8217;t mention it either by video conf. or in person. (Probability: 80%).</li>
<li><strong>Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Preview</strong> &#8211; Apple will give us another taste of what&#8217;s to come.  I also expect to see a release timeline at least down to a quarter, if not an exact date.  My guess is it won&#8217;t go GM until at least WWDC.  Demo is very possible. (Probability: 75%).</li>
<li><strong>Revamped Mac Mini</strong> &#8211; The Mac Mini is overdue for a makeover.  The case has been the same since 2005.  The internals are getting old.  I see a modest speed bump, a refreshed design and NVIDIA chipset. (Probability: 70%).</li>
<li><strong>Updated iMac</strong> &#8211; The iMac is about a year old at this point and also still offers an ATI graphics chip in some models.  I see that disappearing and NVIDIA taking over.  This is in preparation for Snow Leopard who will want more GPU. (Probability: 68%).</li>
<li><strong>iPhone Nano</strong> &#8211; I know 2 manufacturers claim to be making cases for it.  I still suspect it won&#8217;t happen, at least with the iPhone OS we all know.  I figure this because it will be hard to use the OS on a screen smaller than the iPhone.  That said, Apple may be working on a slimmer cell phone focused more as a music player than an application platform.  Think iPod + Phone.  Rather than iPhone. (Probability: 51%).</li>
<li><strong>Updated Apple TV</strong> &#8211; Mixed feelings on this.  Until Apple has a vision for it, I&#8217;m not sure they will keep dumping R&#038;D time into this product.  (Probability: 50%).</li>
<li><strong>Random Price Drops</strong> &#8211; Throughout the keynote, expect prices on low end of each product line to drop compared to current pricing.  New slimmed down products to tickle the fancy of those in conservation mode due to the economy. (Probability: 85%).</li>
<li><strong>iTouch Tablet</strong> &#8211; I think it will happen eventually, but I don&#8217;t expect an announcement soon.  I think earliest is 3Q 2009 (TechCrunch <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/30/large-form-ipod-touch-to-launch-in-fall-09/">suggests the same</a>).  More likely at some point in 2010.  I think it will replace the MacBook Air and be a slim tablet style notebook borrowing heavily from the Air.  I don&#8217;t think Apple has the cost-saving chops to produce an oversized iPod touch at a price consumers would go for.  (Probability for MWSF: 20%).</li>
</ul>
<p>There you have it.  Those are my guesses.  Now lets see what happens.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2296#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2009/01/130f1a8.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/02/mwsf-2009-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Next Generation Of Computing</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/12/13/the-next-generation-of-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/12/13/the-next-generation-of-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kvm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-os-x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got my current laptop in Oct 2005, though the model was released in spring/summer of that year. My Mac mini is an 1st Gen (G4 1.4GHz) from Jan 2005. Needless to say my hardware at home is getting close &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/12/13/the-next-generation-of-computing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got my current laptop in <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/10/21/its-alive/">Oct 2005</a>, though the model was released in spring/summer of that year.  My Mac mini is an 1st Gen (G4 1.4GHz) from Jan 2005.  Needless to say my hardware at home is getting close to the point of needing an upgrade.  Due to my laptop being replaced unexpectedly I have two computers getting to that magic point at almost the same time.  Not much I can do about that.  I&#8217;ve been thinking about the next generation and what I want to do.  Ideally I&#8217;d like to simplify my setup, and hopefully in that process get more bang for the buck.  In some ways I think I will, in others I won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>My initial though is to eventually get a MacBook Pro once it&#8217;s truly 64bit and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067433/confirmed-apple-can-enable-dual-gpu-and-on+the+fly-switching-in-macbook-pro">supports at least 8GB RAM</a>.  GPU accelerated video decoding would also be nice.  I like my computers expandable and to last a while.  In 3-4 years time I think I&#8217;ll want more than 3GB of RAM considering I think 2GB is the minimum today.  Yes the hardware they ship today technically supports this, but Apple&#8217;s firmware doesn&#8217;t for reasons unknown.  I&#8217;d also like one or more USB 3 ports, but we&#8217;ll see if that happens in the 2nd half of 2009 or not.  I don&#8217;t think the lack of would be a deal killer though.  I think it will take quite a while for USB 3.0 speeds to be necessary to the point of widespread adoption.</p>
<p>Laptops are great since they can be moved around which is handy from time to time (though I use my laptop more at my desk than anywhere else), but they do lack the power that I sometimes want.  The Mac mini obviously never delivered what I really needed in that department.  My thought is to build a desktop rig composed of a multi core CPU (whatever makes sense at the moment), min 4GB RAM, at least two SATA drives (primary/backup) and dual boot Windows and Linux.  This beast would be pretty much for when I need some real horsepower.  By building it myself I could invest a little wiser in a good case, power supply, etc. and upgrade this thing through several revisions for years to come rather than throw it all away after a few years.  I can also target my $ towards components I care about.</p>
<p>My primary (day to day) computer would be the MacBook Pro and would likely have Parallels installed so I can run Windows if/when necessary (mainly since Quicken for Mac sucks last I checked and so I can test web pages in Windows).  When I need to do something that laptops suck for due to small slow disks or just being slower, I would have the desktop rig available.</p>
<p>One of the downsides here is that while my current display is VGA/DVI, both of these systems would be DVI.  I could either degrade the signal to VGA and use my current KVM, or upgrade to a DVI capable KVM switch which isn&#8217;t cheap (I haven&#8217;t seen less than $250 for something like a IOGEAR GCS1782).  The DVI switches don&#8217;t support dual displays unless you drop some serious cash, so that&#8217;s pretty much out of the question.  This adds to the complexity.  Is building a KVM for DVI really that much more difficult to warrant the price difference?  Or is it simply there aren&#8217;t enough in the market to drive the price down?</p>
<p>When should I start this?  What system should I target first?  Which should that system replace?  Who the hell knows.  I&#8217;m thinking later next year.  It&#8217;s not so much a &#8220;plan&#8221; as an idea.  I know I need to upgrade to more modern hardware since I won&#8217;t be able to run Mac OS X 10.6, and XP is getting to me.  Both use 2.5&#8243; ATA/100 drives which are becoming hard to find, and even when you find them are pretty small.  Both are maxed out in RAM.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll likely retire the Thinkpad to just for travel and other silliness, and perhaps save the G4 mac mini for some diabolical scheme.  Apple even alludes to some of the possibilities on it&#8217;s site (see &#8220;Big Ideas&#8221; on the right rail of the <a href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/">Mac mini page</a>).</p>
<p>It gets surprisingly complicated when you want it all <em>and</em> have it fit on your desk.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2203#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2008/12/2d969e2.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/12/13/the-next-generation-of-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/11/03/mac-os-x-105-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/11/03/mac-os-x-105-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coverflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-os-x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-os-x-10.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quirks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/11/03/mac-os-x-105-leopard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got my copy of Mac OS X 10.5 earlier this week. Bought it from J&#038;R (via Amazon) since it was $99 + shipping, less than Amazon itself was selling it for. For some reason both of them are able &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/11/03/mac-os-x-105-leopard/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got my copy of Mac OS X 10.5 earlier this week.  Bought it from J&#038;R (via Amazon) since it was $99 + shipping, less than Amazon itself was selling it for.  For some reason both of them are able to undercut Apple (even with a corporate discount) which seemed odd.  Here&#8217;s my rundown of the new OS during the first 24 hours.</p>
<p><span id="more-1529"></span></p>
<h3>Packaging</h3>
<p>Apple&#8217;s packaging has always been known for being better looking and easier to use (no need to rip it apart, easy to get stuff out).  Unlike Mac OS X 10.0 &#8211; 10.4, Leopard uses a new smaller box.  It&#8217;s about the size of the DVD box Apple ships with the Mac Mini (and I believe the iPod has a similar box).  On the front is an eye catching holographic cover.  Inside is one DVD set inside the cardboard sleeve (rather thick) unlike the plastic/paper cover used in previous boxes.  Also inside are the standard Apple stickers and a rather thick <em>color</em> book going over new features in Leopard.  The photos are a little small, but good enough for the explanations.  In an age where most manuals for software are in PDF format, a physical manual is a real luxury.</p>
<h3>Install</h3>
<p>I decided to do a clean install on my Mac Mini (rev 1 G4 @ 1.4GHz  1GB RAM) since I installed 10.4 on top of the stock 10.3, and lots of stuff has been installed over the years.  I made two partitions one for Mac OS 10.3 (so I can try running 10.3 with Classic), and the main partition for Leopard and my data.</p>
<p>Install went very smoothly really nothing to complain about.  The OS DVD has improved since 10.4.  The first great enhancement is that it now can partition without reformatting (technology first seen with the Boot Camp public beta&#8217;s).  I choose to zero my drive anyway, but it&#8217;s nice to know I can adjust partitions.  Also interesting is that if you look at the top right side of the menu bar, you can see that WiFi is available on the installer.  Not exactly sure what you would use it for, but you can connect to an access point.  Overall it took over an hour until I was ready to restart into Leopard.  Initial restart brought me to the first launch video &#8220;Welcome&#8221; obviously redone for Leopard.  Setup went as expected an I was on my desktop without any pain.  Afterwords I put in the Mac OS X CD that came with the computer and installed the apps that came with it (AppleWorks, iMovie HD, GarageBand).  Also very painless So now onto the toys.</p>
<h3>Finder</h3>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/20071103_dock.jpg" alt="Mac OS X Leopard Dock" class="centered" /><br />
Overall the look and feel of the OS is great.  The most obvious change is the newly remodeled dock.  I personally think it looks pretty nice, but maybe that&#8217;s me.  Since I&#8217;ve got a <a href="http://support.apple.com/specs/macmini/Mac_mini_orig.html">Mac Mini</a> with an ATI Radeon 9200 (a mere 32MB) I don&#8217;t get some of the more fancy graphics/animations such as the semi-transparent menu bar that&#8217;s so controversial.  Regardless it looks good. Rounded menu&#8217;s are a nice little bit of polish.  </p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/20071103_coverflow.jpg" alt="Coverflow on Mac OS X Leopard" class="centered" /></p>
<p>Coverflow is an interesting way of browsing media.  I didn&#8217;t expect it to work on my Mac Mini because of the weak graphics card, but it actually works pretty well.  It did however consume a bit of CPU, and disk IO was a little high so if you went to fast, the images weren&#8217;t always preloaded.  Still handy.  </p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/20071103_stack.jpg" alt="Stacks on Mac OS X Tiger" class="alignleft" />Stacks are rather handy, especially for downloads.  Not having them clutter the desktop is a major win.  In just a few hours I can see how great this feature will be in the long term.  Downloads are also tagged (similar to IE on Windows) so you&#8217;re prompted the first time you open them.  I&#8217;d love to see the ability to turn a folder on the desktop into a stack (for easy access).  The new sidebar is really good, it makes things even easier to access with less clicks. Notable is that it found my file server and make it a breeze to connect to.  I can&#8217;t complain about that.  </p>
<p>Scrolling windows that are not in the front is also a great usability tweak.  </p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/20071103_view_path.jpg" alt="Path Bar on Mac OS X Tiger" class="centered" /></p>
<p>The Path bar, disabled by default (In the view menu select &#8220;Show Path Bar&#8221;) is great for keeping track of where you are.  Adjustable grid spacing = awesome.</p>
<h3>Quick Look</h3>
<p>Really fast, and really awesome.  I can see myself using it quite a bit.  This is definitely a time saver.  Ability to go full screen is just a bonus.</p>
<h3>Fonts</h3>
<p>It looks like Apple did some tweaks to how it handles fonts.  Most obvious is that the default minimum for anti-aliasing is now 4px, down from 8px (which looked bad on a few websites with smaller fonts).  The fonts look a little more crisp than they did before, but still feel much smoother than they do on Windows.  I think it&#8217;s a significant win.</p>
<h3>Spotlight</h3>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/20071103_spotlight.jpg" alt="Spotlight on Mac OS X Tiger" class="centered" /></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really use Spotlight to much on my Mac with Tiger.  With Leopard I think I will.  It seems good enough to get rid of QuickSilver which I have yet to install.  You can indeed use it to launch applications.  Indexing didn&#8217;t take to long, search is pretty zippy.</p>
<h3>Spaces</h3>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/20071103_spaces.jpg" alt="Spaces on Mac OS X Tiger" class="centered" /></p>
<p>The one feature I really wanted most was Spaces.  I love the feature of multiple desktops when using Linux and really love that Apple adopted the innovation.  The spaces implementation is pretty good, it&#8217;s in the dock for easy access, also available in the menu bar and via key commands.  Easy to use.  The one thing I would like to see added is a graphical representation of what&#8217;s in each space on the icon.  So I know what spaces are occupied and what are empty like Linux does.  This is a minor thing.  Overall it&#8217;s great.</p>
<h3>Safari</h3>
<p>Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard ships with Safari 3.0.4 (5523.10) installed.  Perfect for downloading Firefox.  Kidding aside it&#8217;s fast and sleek.  Nice additions include the ability to resize a text area on a form (<a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3694">Firefox extension</a> will do the same).  Also new (and very handy) is <a href="http://webkit.org/blog/41/introducing-the-web-inspector/">Web Inspector</a>.</p>
<h3>Dashboard</h3>
<p>Dashboard didn&#8217;t change much, but there&#8217;s now a feature (in conjunction with Safari) called Web Clip which lets you select a piece of a web page and turn it into a widget.  Not a bad idea, but I doubt I&#8217;ll be using it much since I don&#8217;t really use Dashboard that much to begin with.</p>
<h3>Front Row</h3>
<p>Front Row is now available for those computers that didn&#8217;t ship with it, such as my Mac Mini, but without a remote I&#8217;m not sure how useful it would be without the buying a remote such as the Keyspan <a href="http://www.keyspan.com/products/usb/errf1/homepage.spml">ER-RF1</a>.</p>
<h3>iCal</h3>
<p>Lots of little stuff, but until CalDAV is a more accepted standard and accepted by Google and friends, it&#8217;s mostly useless to me.</p>
<h3>Developer Tools</h3>
<p>I need to play with DTrace.  Xcode looks good as usual, Dashcode is awesome, more polished than the developer preview under Tiger.  Also noteworthy is Tiger includes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Apache 2.2.6 </li>
<li>Perl 5.5.8</li>
<li>PHP 5.2.4</li>
<li>Python 2.5.1</li>
<li>Ruby 1.8.6</li>
<li>Java 1.5.0_13</li>
</ul>
<h3>Mail</h3>
<p>I don&#8217;t use Mail to often, but on occasion I play with it.  Forward as an attachment is finally available.  RSS integration isn&#8217;t bad, but not very powerful.  In no way would replace Google Reader.  Archiving mailbox isn&#8217;t such a bad idea.  Could use that in Thunderbird.</p>
<h3>Preview</h3>
<p>Preview got a few nice little additions including a more polished UI that just seems more<br />
intuitive.  It also seems faster with large files.  Lots of new features I&#8217;ve yet to play with.</p>
<h3>Printing</h3>
<p>I was able to setup my networked HP DeskJet without a problem.  Wasn&#8217;t the greatest quality or the fastest but good enough.  I wish HP would provide good drivers themselves, but they are still trying to push their overpriced JetDirect system.  I can always use my Laptop to print so it&#8217;s never been an issue (can also print to PDF for easy transfer).</p>
<h3>Terminal</h3>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/20071103_terminal_with_tabs.jpg" alt="Terminal with Tabs on Mac OS X Tiger" class="centered" /><br />
The terminal now has tabs!  My #1 request for a long time.  Yes there are third party replacements that add this, but those are buggy at best.  This officially makes Terminal cool.</p>
<h3>TextEdit</h3>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s favorite text editor now supports OpenDocument and Word 2007 Formats.  Other than that, I don&#8217;t see anything too noteworthy, just polish (smart quotes, auto linking, etc.).  All work very well.</p>
<h3>Time Machine</h3>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried time Machine since I don&#8217;t have an extra drive large enough at the current time.  I don&#8217;t keep much data on my Mac since my PC laptop is backed up frequently.  As a result I mount the drive when I need something.  Works well enough.  This might change things though.  So much for reviewing the most talked about feature right?</p>
<h3>Performance</h3>
<p>Overall the performance of Leopard on a 1st generation Mac Mini is extremely good.  I personally think it feels more responsive than Tiger and Panther did.  You won&#8217;t see the fancy animations or graphics (it still looks stunning though), but it&#8217;s very usable.  I originally thought it might be a little sluggish based on the discussions of optimizations for Intel based Macs, but Apple seems to (for now) still care at least a little about PPC users.</p>
<h3>Quirks</h3>
<p>I did notice a few quirks with Leopard:</p>
<ul>
<li>Panther/Tiger let me put the computer to sleep and switch to the other computer on my KVM switch.  As long as the switch was done pretty quick the computer just went to sleep.  Leopard doesn&#8217;t like this.  The workaround is to switch, wait about 10 seconds then hit the power button once to put the machine to sleep.</li>
<li><del>When switching back to my Mac, Leopard doesn&#8217;t see a mouse and prompts me to connect a bluetooth mouse.  Obviously my mouse exists, but it&#8217;s USB and my KVM doesn&#8217;t emulate hardware.  Not a major problem, but a little annoying.</del>  See below for instructions how to disable this.</li>
<li>Safari seems to have become a little more memory hungry.  Might be a leak, I only have 1 tab open.  See comments for instructions how to disable this.</li>
<li>Time Machine doesn&#8217;t let you use network volumes to backup.  Would be the best option of all.</li>
<li>Not a quirk but something that&#8217;s &#8220;missing&#8221;: Still no ability to use iCal to write to Google Calendar.</li>
</ul>
<p>So that&#8217;s all for my initial impressions with Tiger after almost 24hours.  I personally really like it, a worth while upgrade.  Can&#8217;t wait until I can upgrade at work.  It&#8217;s by far the best OS Apple has ever put out.  Having played with Vista I can safely say it is a much more functional, easy to use, and more powerful OS.  It&#8217;s clearly designed with the user in mind.</p>
<p><small><strong>Edit [11/4/2007 @ 10:15 PM EST]:</strong> There is a way to disable the bluetooth input device prompts.</small>
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/11/03/mac-os-x-105-leopard/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2007/11/aa486f2.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/11/03/mac-os-x-105-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Event Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/08/06/apple-event-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/08/06/apple-event-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-os-x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/08/06/apple-event-tomorrow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an Apple Event tomorrow. Someone noticed there is a scheduled .Mac outage about the same time, meaning a likely upgrade for those users. I&#8217;m guessing an announcement about pre-orders for Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard and new iMacs. Possibly &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/08/06/apple-event-tomorrow/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an Apple Event tomorrow.  Someone noticed there is a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/%27mac/mac-scheduled-downtime-during-apple-event-tomorrow-286532.php">scheduled .Mac outage</a> about the same time, meaning a likely upgrade for those users.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing an announcement about pre-orders for <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/">Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard</a> and new <a href="http://www.apple.com/imac/">iMacs</a>.  Possibly a speed bump for <a href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/">Mac Mini&#8217;s</a> and some sort of <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/">iLife</a> product upgrade.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/08/06/apple-event-tomorrow/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2007/08/97275a2.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/08/06/apple-event-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third Party iPhone Apps</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/05/13/third-party-iphone-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/05/13/third-party-iphone-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 06:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xulrunner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/05/13/third-party-iphone-apps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is said to be wrestling with the idea of allowing third party apps. In reality they are deciding if they should aid developers. I think it&#8217;s pretty clear there will be hacks to get third party software on there. &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/05/13/third-party-iphone-apps/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/05/11/apple-wrestles-with-3rd-party-iphone-apps/">said to be wrestling with the idea</a> of allowing third party apps.  In reality they are deciding if they should aid developers.  I think it&#8217;s pretty clear there <em>will</em> be hacks to get third party software on there.  The question is if Apple will bless the efforts or not.</p>
<p>Come on Steve&#8230; release the SDK and let us have some fun and make your product even more useful.  The availability of good software is what has kept the Palm Treo and every Windows Mobile device alive despite Blackberry fever.</p>
<p>It would be an interesting platform for a Mobile XULRunner via <a href="http://apcmag.com/6041/firefox_will_move_to_mobile_phones_mozilla_ceo">Mozilla&#8217;s mobile efforts</a>.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget.  Part of the Mac mini&#8217;s success is that it is small enough to embed in all sorts of places.  Apple has even taken advantage of that press by putting it on their <a href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/">Mac mini</a> page (lower right &#8220;Big Ideas&#8221;).  Hackable products sell.  Just ask Linksys about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRT54G">WRT54G</a>.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/05/13/third-party-iphone-apps/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2007/05/512c5ca.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/05/13/third-party-iphone-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Playground</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/04/20/microsofts-playground/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/04/20/microsofts-playground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootcamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/04/20/microsofts-playground/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beautiful tour of Microsoft&#8217;s Mac Lab. I think my favorite is the pic of all the Mac Mini&#8217;s. Every geek&#8217;s dream is to have a hardware collection that vast. I really love how they manage OS versions: &#8230;On each machine &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/04/20/microsofts-playground/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://davidweiss.blogspot.com/2006/04/tour-of-microsofts-mac-lab.html">Beautiful tour of Microsoft&#8217;s Mac Lab</a>.  I think my favorite is the pic of all the Mac Mini&#8217;s.  Every geek&#8217;s dream is to have a hardware collection that vast.  I really love how they manage OS versions:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8230;On each machine we have two volumes: ChangeOS and Mac OS X. The Mac OS X volume is where we install the different versions of the OS. We boot to the ChangeOS volume to free up the Mac OS X volume for modification. When we trigger an automation run we specify the OS version and language. Each machine then reboots to the ChangeOS partition, caches the OS .dmg locally and uses the asr command line tool to restore the image. The tool that does this work is one I wrote (in AppleScript Studio no less!) called Lab Assistant. We have images of the Mac OS from 8.1 all the way up to 10.4.6 in all the languages our products support. &#8230;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Very cool stuff.  I&#8217;d love if they would automate that into a nice little installer, similar to Apple&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/">Boot Camp</a>.  Very cool stuff indeed.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/04/20/microsofts-playground/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/04/299a23a.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/04/20/microsofts-playground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 failures in a week</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/11/2-failures-in-a-week/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/11/2-failures-in-a-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-os-x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows-XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/03/11/2-failures-2-days/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week my private server had some corruption on the system partition. Seems to be related to the system log file from what I can figure out. I&#8217;ve got it back up and running, mostly. Though not 100%. If it &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/11/2-failures-in-a-week/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week my private server had some corruption on the system partition.  Seems to be related to the system log file from what I can figure out.  I&#8217;ve got it back up and running, mostly.  Though not 100%.  If it was running something newer than 10.2 Jaguar, I&#8217;d likely be in better shape.  Not much work, but because it&#8217;s 266MHz, it takes a year to do something as simple as upgrade perl.  Despite that, the tough little box is still chugging away.  Thanks to partitioning, and putting the drive in an external enclosure and hooking it up to my Mac Mini with Mac OS X 10.4, all user data is intact.  That&#8217;s really what&#8217;s important.</p>
<p>Now today a Windows XP system decides to corrupt itself.  Not quite done with evaluating the damage and repairs.  I got it to boot, not sure what else is hiding under the murky waters of Windows XP.  That&#8217;s the goal for tonight.</p>
<p>What did I learn?  I really need to get some better backup systems working on these two computers.  I&#8217;m sick of doing this.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/03/11/2-failures-2-days/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/03/08fe262.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/11/2-failures-in-a-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac Mini 2.0</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/01/mac-mini-20/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/01/mac-mini-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook-pro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/03/01/mac-mini-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have my G4 Mac Mini&#8230; but now it&#8217;s outdated because, it&#8217;s now available as a Intel powered Mac Mini. So cool in just about every way, except the Intel Integrated Graphics, which even Apple agrees is junk. I do &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/01/mac-mini-20/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my G4 Mac Mini&#8230; but now it&#8217;s outdated because, it&#8217;s now available as a <a href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/">Intel powered Mac Mini</a>.  So cool in just about every way, except the Intel Integrated Graphics, which <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20050401054016/www.apple.com/macmini/graphics.html">even Apple agrees is junk</a>.  I do like the audio in put (which was missing on the G4 version), and support for <a href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/frontrow.html">FrontRow</a>.  I wonder how many will be stacking them, so you can swap between the two architectures with a KVM switch.</p>
<p>Also saw a <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a> the other day.  Oh so very sexy.  Very slick as usual.  </p>
<p>Now what I <em>really</em> want to see (and have) is the replacement for the PowerMac.  In my dreams it&#8217;s quad core, ships with 2GB RAM, dual SATA hard drives, and has a pretty similar design to the current PowerMac line.  Oh yea, a 2nd media bay for another drive or accessory.  I don&#8217;t like having a whole tower and 1 bay.  </p>
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/03/01/mac-mini-20/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/03/6b18003.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/01/mac-mini-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Black Box</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/09/29/apples-black-box/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/09/29/apples-black-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-mini]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a rather interesting promotion. Think Secret has a decent rundown of what&#8217;s in the mystery boxes. These new units fix some really big issues with the mini (faster hard drive, more video ram in particular). That faster hard &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/09/29/apples-black-box/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a rather interesting<a href="http://news.com.com/Apple+offers+Mac+Mini+grab+bag/2100-1042_3-5885485.html?tag=nefd.top"> promotion</a>.  Think Secret has a <a href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0509macmini2.html">decent rundown</a> of what&#8217;s in the mystery boxes.   These new units fix some really big issues with the mini (faster hard drive, more video ram in particular).  That faster hard drive will make a big issue with performance on the mini.  It&#8217;s a really cool system, I love it.  My biggest complaint is 256MB&#8217;s of RAM it originally shipped with (now a better 512), and the 4200RPM hard drive.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=848#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2005/09/362e80d.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/09/29/apples-black-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

