<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Accettura&#039;s Fun With Wordage &#187; google analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/tag/google-analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://robert.accettura.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='robert.accettura.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Issues Behind localStorage</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2012/01/13/privacy-issues-behind-localstorage/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2012/01/13/privacy-issues-behind-localstorage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=7129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Browsers need to overhaul their privacy settings to account for things like localStorage and bring control back to the user. In the days of cookies it was relatively simple for a user to wipe any identifiers (excluding IP address) from &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2012/01/13/privacy-issues-behind-localstorage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browsers need to overhaul their privacy settings to account for things like <code>localStorage</code> and bring control back to the user.  In the days of cookies it was relatively simple for a user to wipe any identifiers (excluding IP address) from their browser.  Simply clear cookies.</p>
<p>Firefox has two basic abilities, you can clear cookies, or you can browse and delete cookies.  That&#8217;s great but not terribly clear that there&#8217;s more than cookies.</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/20120112_firefox_cookie_privacy.jpg" alt="Firefox Cookie Privacy" title="Firefox Cookie Privacy" width="403" height="340" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7136" /></p>
<p>Chrome <strike>as far as I know has no cookie browser like Firefox has, but</strike> (edit: <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2012/01/13/privacy-issues-behind-localstorage/comment-page-1/#comment-1618984">Erunno</a> notes in the comments you can via <a href="chrome://settings/cookies">chrome://settings/cookies</a>) explicitly lets you &#8220;Delete cookies and other site and plug-in data&#8221;.  That&#8217;s pretty good.</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/20120112_chrome_cookie_privacy.jpg" alt="Chrome Cookie Privacy" title="Chrome Cookie Privacy" width="502" height="262" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7142" /></p>
<p>Today, I think Safari&#8217;s UI is the closest to perfect.  Each hostname shows exactly what it has.  My only gripe is that Safari doesn&#8217;t let you see what&#8217;s there.  That&#8217;s a &#8220;power-user&#8221; feature however and I think it does an adequate job regardless.</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/20120112_safari_cookie_privacy.jpg" alt="Safari Cookie Privacy" title="Safari Cookie Privacy" width="620" height="417" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7137" /></p>
<p>Websites use more than just cookies these days.  I discussed this <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2010/10/11/on-html5-and-the-future-of-privacy/">a little over a year ago</a>.  The reason  <a href="http://samy.pl/evercookie/">evercookie</a> is controversial is that browsers don&#8217;t quite give users the level of control (real or perceived) that they expect for objects other than cookies.</p>
<p>Here is another use case for why this is needed.  Google Analytics is used on perhaps <a href="http://trends.builtwith.com/analytics/Google-Analytics">half the internet&#8217;s websites</a>.  It sets a cookie every time.  That means 230 bytes added to every http request for a lot of websites.  Google <a href="http://code.google.com/p/analytics-issues/issues/detail?can=5&#038;start=0&#038;num=100&#038;q=&#038;colspec=ID%20Component%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Stars%20Summary&#038;groupby=&#038;sort=&#038;id=143">could</a> switch to <code>localStorage</code> and free up that 230 bytes.  While they technically could do this, in practice, this could create a firestorm of attacks against them.  The problem is it would be spun as Google trying to evade cookie deletion and and a privacy violation.  The same storm that evercookie created.  I suspect that&#8217;s why it hasn&#8217;t been done to date.  The truth is the Google Analytics team has done a lot for improving performance including making it entirely async.  But this move would be controversial.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no longer about &#8220;cookies&#8221;, but &#8220;user data&#8221;.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=7129#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2012/01/bcc2bdb.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2012/01/13/privacy-issues-behind-localstorage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! Web Analytics</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/08/yahoo-web-analytics/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/08/yahoo-web-analytics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo web analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It went somewhat unnoticed, but Yahoo! today announced it&#8217;s Yahoo! Web Analytics package which is intended to compete with the wildly popular Google Analytics. I&#8217;ve spent quite a few hours in analytics packages over the years ranging from very amateurish &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/08/yahoo-web-analytics/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It went somewhat unnoticed, but Yahoo! today announced it&#8217;s <a href="http://web.analytics.yahoo.com/">Yahoo! Web Analytics</a> package which is intended to compete with the wildly popular Google Analytics.  I&#8217;ve spent quite a few hours in analytics packages over the years ranging from very amateurish to enterprise grade.  Google Analytics is a very good product but it does have limitations.  The biggest limitation is the lack of real-time reporting.  Google Analytics takes a few hours, making it for most people next-day service.  This isn&#8217;t a big deal for some, but if your in an environment where you need feedback on your content ASAP (a must for media sites), this is a huge deal.  Yahoo is promising to deliver &#8220;within minutes&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://web.analytics.yahoo.com/"><p>
Get detailed reporting <strong>within minutes</strong> after an action occurs on your website. Quickly identify dips in key site metrics or monitor the performance of new content. Seeing the impact of website and marketing changes immediately makes it much easier to optimize them. Yahoo! Web Analytics also maintains historical data so you can go back at any time to review old data for new insight, or compare the present to the past without any changes to your page tags.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting.  I wonder if this will light a fire under Google&#8217;s butt to deliver real-time analytics as well.  Urchin wasn&#8217;t really designed for real-time data.  Google&#8217;s obviously done a lot of work with it to build Google Analytics.  I wonder if that&#8217;s the next step for them.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2061#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2008/10/52dbb06.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/08/yahoo-web-analytics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

