<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Accettura&#039;s Fun With Wordage &#187; chase</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/tag/chase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://robert.accettura.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='robert.accettura.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Secrets In Websites II</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/11/secrets-in-websites-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/11/secrets-in-websites-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[akamai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill richardson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dennis kucinich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duncan hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fred thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike gravel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popurls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rudy guliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrets in websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom tancredo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/01/11/secrets-in-websites-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is a follow up to the first Secrets In Websites. For those who don&#8217;t remember the first time, I point out odd, interesting, funny things in other websites&#8217; code. Yes it takes some time to put a post &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/11/secrets-in-websites-ii/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is a follow up to the first <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/20/secrets-in-websites/">Secrets In Websites</a>.  For those who don&#8217;t remember the first time, I point out odd, interesting, funny things in other websites&#8217; code.  Yes it takes some time to put a post like this together, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s just about a year since the last time.  Enough with the intro, read on for the code.</p>
<p><span id="more-1270"></span></p>
<h3>The Code</h3>
<h4>WordPress.com</h4>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice a comment sure to make any web developer laugh on WordPress.com&#8217;s <a href="http://wordpress.com/wp-login.php">login page</a></p>
<pre>

	&lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; href=&quot;http://wordpress.com/wp-admin/wp-admin.css?version=MU&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; /&gt;
	&lt;!--[if IE]&gt;
		&lt;style type=&quot;text/css&quot;&gt;#login h1 a { margin-top: 35px; } #login #login_error { margin-bottom: 10px; }&lt;/style&gt;&lt; ![endif]--&gt;
	&lt;!-- Curse you, IE! --&gt;
</pre>
<p>The guys behind <a href="http://www.wordpress.com">WordPress</a> a <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/press/releases/20050601/">while back</a> took the site <a href="http://browsehappy.com/">BrowseHappy</a> under its wing.  WordPress has always been a strong believer in web standards, so this isn&#8217;t surprising (though still amusing).  Did you also know that the guys behind it (<a href="http://automattic.com/about/">Automattic</a>) don&#8217;t have job titles?  Unless you consider &#8220;Chief BBQ Taste Tester&#8221; to be a real job title.  <a href="http://www.photomatt.net">Matt</a>, I hope your job doesn&#8217;t kill you with a heart attack.</p>
<h4>Facebook</h4>
<p>The geniuses over at <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> feel the same and put the following on the top of their IE conditionally included <a href="http://static.ak.facebook.com/css/ie6.css?48:76473">stylesheets</a>:</p>
<pre>

/*  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Facebook | IE/PC Hacks | getfirefox.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------  */
</pre>
<h4>popurls</h4>
<p>The ever so popular <a href="http://www.popurls.com">popurls</a> has the following comment in the header of the page.</p>
<pre>

&lt;!--

  __   __
 (  \,/  )
  \_ | _/  IN THE FUTURE EVERY URL WILL BE POPULAR FOR 1.5 SECONDS
  (_/ \_)                  - thomas and the wise popurls butterfly

--&gt;
</pre>
<h4>RedHat</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.redhat.com">RedHat</a> was one of the earlier corporate sites to redo itself into a standards based design.  They have great respect for those who came before them.  In their <a href="http://www.redhat.com/s/master.css">master css</a> file they have the following tribute as well as a little remark about Netscape 4.x:</p>
<pre>

/* 	redhat.com MASTER style sheet

	a tip of the red hat to Zeldman, Bowman, Meyer, Shea, Cederholm, Newhouse, Holzschlag,
	and many, many other css and web standards pioneers who have inspired us. 

	the css, layout and validation status of redhat.com is a work-in-progress. numerous
	web-building worker bees are working furiously to correct the bugs, minimize the hacks
	and validate the code. stay tuned. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------- created June 2004 */
@import url(&quot;global.css&quot;);
...
@import url(&quot;dig.css&quot;);

/* ---------------------------------------------------------------- ns4 styles - bah! */

table {
	border: 1px;
	}
...
</pre>
<h4>Panic Software</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.panic.com/">Panic Software</a> has a cool little piece of code for those who browse the product page for <a href="http://www.panic.com/coda/">Coda</a> (awesome product btw) with IE and don&#8217;t have at least version 6.0:</p>
<pre>

		&lt;!--[if lte IE 6]&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;iewarning&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/extras/ripoff/images/ie-warning.gif&quot; alt=&quot;IE Warning&quot; title=&quot;We hear Firefox is nice!&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt; ![endif]--&gt;
</pre>
<p>I hear it&#8217;s pretty nice too.</p>
<p>Panic also has a comment in the head of their homepage that reads:</p>
<pre>

&lt;!-- This homepage design is not long for this world. Enjoy it while you can! <img src='http://robert.accettura.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  --&gt;
</pre>
<h4>Twitter</h4>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a> (who redirects to drop the &#8216;www&#8217; btw) is a very popular service these days.  In their html they mark which server served up the data.  You&#8217;ll see it in the form:</p>
<pre>

  &lt;!-- served to you through a copper wire by bennu.twitter.com at 24 Nov 19:08 in 11 ms (d 0 / r 8). thank you, come again. --&gt;
</pre>
<p>Copper eh?  No fiber in your data center?  I won&#8217;t judge, as long as your bandwidth is plentiful.</p>
<h4>WordPress.com</h4>
<p>Here&#8217;s a bonus from <a href="http://wordpress.com/">WordPress</a>.  While many analytics programs use a 1px transparent &#8220;tracker gif&#8221; to manage statistics, WordPress did something a little different.  At the very bottom on the left hand side, you can see the face of WordPress analytics in all it&#8217;s tiny glory.</p>
<h4>Mozilla</h4>
<p>This technically applies to more than just Firefox.  You&#8217;d be surprised to see how many times <code>kungFuDeathGrip</code> is in the <a href="http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/search?string=kungFuDeathGrip">code base</a>.</p>
<h4>Many Sites using Google Products/Services</h4>
<p>Many people have noticed strange Google tags on sites such as:</p>
<pre>

code
&lt;!--googleoff: index--&gt;
all
&lt;!--googleon: index--&gt;
over
</pre>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a &#8220;SEO&#8221; practice, despite some misconception on the web.  This is used by the Google Search Appliance, a product made by Google which many websites use to power their own search engines to tell the engine what to read and what to ignore.  It wouldn&#8217;t be practical for Google to use these &#8220;in the wild&#8221;.  The reason is that spammers could effectively hide an alternate website within those comments.  Google&#8217;s business is based largely on accurate search results.  Spammers have already tried to abuse the css property <code>display: none;</code>.  This would be even better.  You can find code like this on <a href="http://www.apple.com">Apple.com</a> among many other sites.</p>
<p>Webmasters <em>can</em> however optimize their side for AdSense using a technique <a href="http://google.com/support/adsense/bin/answer.py?answer=23168">recommended by Google</a>:</p>
<pre>

&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;

&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;
</pre>
<p>This tells Google to give weight to a certain part of your page when deciding what ad to display on the page.  This is good for cases where you feel other material on your page is influencing the ads and resulting in off-topic ads.</p>
<h3>Infrastructure/Platform</h3>
<h4>Microsoft</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a>&#8216;s offering against Linux and Apache is IIS on Windows.  Which one would expect they themselves use.  What they don&#8217;t tell you is that they also have used <a href="http://www.akamai.com/">Akamai</a> (with over <a href="http://www.akamai.com/html/about/facts_figures.html">25,000</a> servers), which uses <a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39115920,00.htm">Linux</a>.  They have used Akamai for many things like DNS, and caching files.  Rather than &#8220;Powered By Windows Server&#8221; maybe they should append &#8220;hiding behind Linux&#8221;.</p>
<h4>Myspace.com</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.myspace.com">Myspace.com</a> was previously Adobe/Macromedia&#8217;s model customer because it was written in <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/">ColdFusion</a>, and said to be the biggest ColdFusion site on the net (and one of the biggest sites on the net).  Many think it still is, but it&#8217;s not.  While many url&#8217;s suggest it might be because they end in <code>.cfm</code> it&#8217;s actually running ASP.net and has been <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/03/25/Handling-1.5-Billion-Page-Views-Per-Day-Using-ASP.NET-2.0.aspx">since aprox, 2006</a>.  You can confirm this by viewing the headers on some of their pages.  You&#8217;ll see:</p>
<pre>
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
</pre>
<h4>MTV.com</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.mtv.com">MTV.com</a>&#8216;s site has search powered by a Google Search Appliance.  MTV is also owned by <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/">Viacom who sued Google</a>, the parent company of YouTube.  The folks at MTV awesomely <a href="http://labsblog.mtv.com/category/site-relaunch/">admitted the irony during relaunch on their blog</a>.</p>
<h4>Global Crossing</h4>
<p>Tier 1 networking provider <a href="http://www.globalcrossing.com/">Global Crossing</a> really wants you to know how fast they are.  Doing a trace could turn up something like this:</p>
<pre>
  7    15 ms    13 ms    14 ms  COMCAST-IP-SERVICES-LLC.tengigabitethernet1-4.ar5.NYC1.gblx.net [64.208.222.58]
  8    14 ms    13 ms    13 ms  tengigabitethernet1-4.ar5.NYC1.gblx.net [64.208.222.57]
</pre>
<p>Yes that&#8217;s right, they use 10 GigE!  Just FYI.</p>
<h3>Goofy</h3>
<h4>Firefox 2.0</h4>
<p>In Firefox 2.0, go to &#8220;About Firefox&#8221; (under the help menu for Windows, under the Firefox menu for Mac), and click on credits.  You&#8217;ll notice <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/the_colbert_report/index.jhtml">Stephen Colbert</a>.  He wrote it single handedly, but added some other names because he&#8217;s a nice guy.  Bonus: I&#8217;m on the list too.  Above him because I&#8217;m <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/11/17/who-dropped-the-soap/">better</a> than him.  That&#8217;s right, I said it.</p>
<h3>Handy</h3>
<h4>Chase</h4>
<p>Chase for some reason puts it&#8217;s login form in plain text.  The submit url is https, but it doesn&#8217;t feel right.  They do have a SSL enabled login page, but for some reason they hide it.  Here it is for those interested:</p>
<p><a href="https://chaseonline.chase.com/online/home/sso_co_home.jsp">https://chaseonline.chase.com/online/home/sso_co_home.jsp</a></p>
<h4>Google</h4>
<p>For some reason, most of Google&#8217;s services are insecure by default.  By simply going to https, you can use SSL for added security.<br />
Gmail: <a href="https://mail.google.com">https://mail.google.com</a><br />
Google Calendar: <a href="https://www.google.com/calendar">https://www.google.com/calendar</a><br />
Google Reader: <a href="https://www.google.com/reader">https://www.google.com/reader</a></p>
<p>On the <a href="2/">next page</a> is the 2008 US Presidential Candidate Campaign sites&#8230;</p>
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/01/11/secrets-in-websites-ii/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2008/01/c850371.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/11/secrets-in-websites-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting A Non-RFID Credit Card</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/04/02/getting-a-non-rfid-credit-card/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/04/02/getting-a-non-rfid-credit-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech (General)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit-card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/04/02/getting-a-non-rfid-credit-card/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chase Freedom credit card isn&#8217;t bad (1% cash back, 3% on certain items). There is an unadvertised downside. While Chase doesn&#8217;t promote it very well, the card contains a tiny RFID chip. This allows you to pay for something &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/04/02/getting-a-non-rfid-credit-card/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/20070402_chase_freedom_visa.jpg" alt="Chase Freedom Visa" class="alignleft" />The Chase Freedom credit card isn&#8217;t bad (1% cash back, 3% on certain items).  There is an unadvertised downside.  While Chase doesn&#8217;t promote it very well, the card contains a tiny RFID chip.  This allows you to pay for something using a contact-less terminal (no swiping).  Just put your card near the reader and it registers.  Is it really any quicker than swiping?  Who knows, but likely not by much.</p>
<p>It looks like a regular credit card, same thickness, size, and shape.  Just a tiny emblem exists on the upper right hand side to distinguish the onboard cargo.  You can see it in the image above.  A larger version of it is below:</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/20070402_blink.png" alt="Blink Logo (sm) Chase" class="centered" /></p>
<p>For those wondering, the actual RFID chip seems to be on the left side, opposite the Blink logo.</p>
<p>Chase brands the technology <a href="http://www.chaseblink.com">Blink</a>, American Express calls it <a href="https://www124.americanexpress.com/cards/loyalty.do?page=expresspay">ExpressPay</a>, MasterCard calls it <a href="http://www.mastercard.com/paypass/">PayPass</a>.  They are all pretty much the same thing.</p>
<p>RFID doesn&#8217;t have a great reputation right now.  There are some privacy and security concerns, such as an unauthorized party reading your credit card without you knowing.  Think this is a tin-foil-hat mentality?  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/23/business/23card.html?ei=5090&#038;en=76401b1601fc06e3&#038;ex=1319256000&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=all&#038;pagewanted=print&#038;pagewanted=print">It&#8217;s been done</a> already.  I haven&#8217;t found anything online to indicate criminal exploitation yet, but it&#8217;s possible and will happen.</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/20070402_chase_flexible_rewards_visa.jpg" alt="Chase Flexible Rewards Visa" class="alignleft" />Chase doesn&#8217;t advertise this, but if you <a href="http://www.chase.com/ccp/index.jsp?pg_name=ccpmapp/card_servicing/customer_service/page/PFSCreditCustSupport">contact</a> them by phone or email, they will send you a replacement card, without the &#8220;Blink&#8221; capability.  The actual plastic card is their &#8220;Rewards Visa&#8221; though the paper it&#8217;s attached to clearly says &#8220;Chase Freedom&#8221;.  It&#8217;s just plastic, the credit plan is in the account not the card.  So there you have it, you <em>can</em> get a secure credit card if your concerned about security.</p>
<p>Chase claims &#8220;Blink&#8221; it&#8217;s very secure, but I&#8217;m still not personally comfortable with the technology.  According to their <a href="http://www.chaseblink.com/FAQs.pdf">FAQ</a> (in PDF format):</p>
<blockquote><p>
10. Are blink purchases secure?</p>
<p>Yes. As always, you are 100% protected against any unauthorized purchases. These transactions are safe because they are protected by an additional level of encrypted security. You must deliberately use the Chase card with blink at the point-of-sale to make a transaction. The Chase card with blink needs to be within an inch of the special reader and correctly oriented to be read. In addition, blink transactions use specific data that is protected by the highest level of security.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Judging from the speed in which it can be swiped (as demonstrated on the <a href="http://www.chaseblink.com/">Chase blink website</a>) one could technically walk by with a bag containing a reader and just brush by the victim to read the card in their pants pocket, sit next to you on the bus/train, etc.  Easier than pickpocketing since no actual contact needed (such as digging a hand into someone&#8217;s pocket).</p>
<p>We already know they can clone <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/blog/2007/03/cloning_an_rfid.html">RFID passports</a>.  What stops someone from reproducing the credit card, then using it?  With regular cards, my wallet is an effective firewall.  No way to read the magnetic strip or copy the numbers off of it without the actual card visible.  And if my card is missing, I know I have a problem.  I always keep it in my wallet so nobody can just look at it.  This is a pretty secure way to handle a credit card.  With this potential crime, I wouldn&#8217;t even know right away, and by the time I do realize I wouldn&#8217;t have any idea when/where it was compromised.  It could potentially be months between the theft and usage of stolen data.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see this tech a little more proven in the &#8220;real world&#8221; before I jump on board.  For now it&#8217;s just good to know you don&#8217;t have to live with it, you can get a non-RFID card.  I didn&#8217;t find this advertised anywhere on the Chase website.  I guess they realized us tin-foil-hat people would ask for a blink-free card, so they made sure to have an alternative.  I must give them credit for that (no pun intended).</p>
<p>Just call/email Chase and ask for a non-blink version of the card.  They told me 5-7 days for delivery.  No hassle.  I was very pleased how painlessly they made it.  It arrived in about 5 days.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/04/02/getting-a-non-rfid-credit-card/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2007/04/fe51510.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/04/02/getting-a-non-rfid-credit-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

