<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Accettura&#039;s Fun With Wordage &#187; barclays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/tag/barclays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://robert.accettura.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='robert.accettura.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Barclays Blocks Firefox</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/05/barclays-blocks-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/05/barclays-blocks-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american-express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/01/05/barclays-blocks-firefox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech site The INQUIRER mentions that Barclays says no to Firefox. Reporter confirms this is a problem. Relatively speaking, it&#8217;s a small percentage compared to American Express, who was a long time problem for many Firefox users. It seems financial &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/05/barclays-blocks-firefox/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech site The INQUIRER mentions that <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/01/03/barclays-firefox">Barclays says no to Firefox</a>.  Reporter <a href="http://reporter.mozilla.org/app/query/?host_hostname=%25barclays%25&#038;selected%5B%5D=host_hostname&#038;selected%5B%5D=report_file_date&#038;show=25&#038;product_family=&#038;page=1">confirms</a> this is a problem.  Relatively speaking, it&#8217;s a small percentage compared to American Express, who was a long time problem for many Firefox users.  It seems financial institutions have long been a problem in terms of Firefox compatibility and web standards in general.</p>
<p>Personally I think most of the larger financial institutions have resolved their issues.  It&#8217;s mainly just the handful of banks who don&#8217;t don&#8217;t invest much in their online infrastructure.  Compared to how the landscape looked 2 years ago, I think there has been a lot of progress.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a major win for Linux and Mac users who are finding it easier to do finances without being hassled.</p>
<p>Were do people feel things stand these days?  Has the landscape been improving?  Do <em>you</em> still encounter issues?  With whom?
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/01/05/barclays-blocks-firefox/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2008/01/a14ac55.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/05/barclays-blocks-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

