<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Accettura&#039;s Fun With Wordage &#187; antivirus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/tag/antivirus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://robert.accettura.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='robert.accettura.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>How To Be More Secure With Your Data &amp; Identity</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/11/23/how-to-be-more-secure-with-your-data-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/11/23/how-to-be-more-secure-with-your-data-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s amazing how on a daily basis there&#8217;s a story about someone&#8217;s identity or data being stolen, personal info being misused, or just getting screwed via the Internet. Most of the time it&#8217;s due to a complete lack of standards &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/11/23/how-to-be-more-secure-with-your-data-identity/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how on a daily basis there&#8217;s a story about someone&#8217;s identity or data being stolen, personal info being misused, or just getting screwed via the Internet.  Most of the time it&#8217;s due to a complete lack of standards regarding how people treat their digital property and identity.  It&#8217;s the electronic equivalent of leaving your home and not locking the door.  Anyone can come in and take what they want.<br />
<span id="more-2147"></span></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Use SSL When Available</strong> &#8211; Many sites offer SSL interfaces to make them more secure.  Sometimes it&#8217;s used by default, sometimes it&#8217;s not.  You can often test yourself by just changing the <code>http://</code> in the url to <code>https:</code>.  For example, you can do this for virtually all Google services including, <a href="https://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a>, <a href="https://mail.google.com">Gmail</a>, <a href="https://www.google.com/calendar">Google Calendar</a>, etc.  For Gmail there&#8217;s even an <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/making-security-easier.html">option to force SSL</a>.  If you still haven&#8217;t enabled this, do so now.  Many non-Google products offer this too, for example <a href="https://www.meebo.com">Meebo</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Be Cautious Of Open Networks</strong> &#8211; Just because you see a WiFi hotspot doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s safe.  It&#8217;s trivial for someone to sit in a coffee shop with a laptop and pretend to be free internet access.  Once someone connects they can essentially snoop on all that persons traffic.  Connect only to networks you know and only use services over a VPN or HTTPS so that your traffic isn&#8217;t in plain text.  To be extra cautious limit the amount of high risk activities you do on these networks (do your banking from home).</li>
<li><strong>Don&#8217;t Connect To The Internet Directly</strong> &#8211; Even if you have only one computer, it&#8217;s still advisable to have an access point between you and your internet connection.  Virtually all access points today provide decent firewall protection that will shield you from any of the horrors that exist on the internet.  Any NAT device will provide a degree of protection (though NAT isn&#8217;t a firewall replacement).  Access points can often be found for under $50 making this a very sound investment.  Yes there are software firewalls, but they have downsides.  The minimum is a hardware device between your computer and your broadband modem</li>
<li><strong>Use Encryption For Your Home WiFi</strong> &#8211; If you have a home wireless network, make sure you have encryption enabled and use it.  Ideally you should be using WPA2/AES since it&#8217;s the <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/11/06/wifi-wpa-encryption-partially-hacked/">most secure</a> at this point, though anything is better than nothing.  While sites you browse over HTTPS are encrypted, you still want the entire tunnel encrypted.  This does hurt performance slightly but most modern hardware (even the cheap stuff) is more than capable of handling this.  Odds are you run an 802.11g network and your wireless is way faster than your broadband anyway.  If you don&#8217;t have this enabled or don&#8217;t know how, check the manual, the manufacturer&#8217;s website or call tech support for help.  You should be doing this.</li>
<li><strong>Don&#8217;t Trust IM or Email For Confidential Information</strong> &#8211; IM and Email aren&#8217;t very secure mechanisms for sending information.  They should never be trusted for things like sending credit cards, social security numbers, medical information, etc.  If you ever see a merchant <a href="http://www.davidj.org/stories/222/Credit_Card_Information_Sent_Over_AOL_Instant_Messenger.html">using IM to process a credit card</a> (so they only need 1 terminal rather than one per location), pay cash or walk away.  Sadly it happens.  It&#8217;s perfectly fine for chatting with your friends, but not good for secure information.  It&#8217;s possible to encrypt email with PGP or GPG, and IM&#8217;s with OTR or an encryption certificate but they require both parties to utilize them and are somewhat technical in nature and therefore few actually use them.</li>
<li><strong>Only Download From Trusted Sources</strong> &#8211; Download only from trusted places. Download software only from the developer&#8217;s website, not just any place that has it.  Look for software at places like <a href="http://www.tucows.com/">Tucows</a>, <a href="http://fileforum.betanews.com/">FileForum</a>, <a href="http://www.download.com">download.com</a> (operated by my employer) and other well trusted download locations.  There&#8217;s a lot of hoax sites out there trying to distribute malware (malicious software).  Also be suspicious of anyone offering commercial software for free.</li>
<li><strong>Keep your AntiVirus Up To Date</strong> &#8211; Just installing AntiVirus software isn&#8217;t enough.  The program is useless unless you keep the virus definitions (the files which tell the software what is a virus and what isn&#8217;t) up to date.  All modern AntiVirus software does this automatically for the duration of the subscription.  When your subscription expires either upgrade to a new version or renew the subscription.  There are enough free AntiVirus solutions out there for Windows to make it inexcusable to not have protection.  For paid AntiVirus, Norton AntiVirus 2009 is pretty good (I use it and <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/10/13/norton-antivirus-2009/">reviewed it</a> myself).  So is <a href="http://www.kaspersky.com/">Kaspersky</a>.  <a href="http://www.avast.com/eng/download-avast-home.html">Avast</a> and <a href="http://free.avg.com/">AVG</a> would be my personal recommendations for free.</li>
<li><strong>Use AntiSpyware</strong> &#8211; AntiVirus products go a long way, but you&#8217;re much better off if you use an AntiSpyware product as well.  Many of them are free downloads, just make sure you get them from reputable places.  I&#8217;d recommend <a href="http://www.spybot.com/">Spybot S&#038;D</a>, <a href="http://www.lavasoft.com/single/trialpay.php">AdAware</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx">Windows Defender</a>.  Make sure to run the updater within the product at least once a week, and scan on occasion (weekly, biweekly, whatever).  Mac users don&#8217;t really need to do anything here as Spyware isn&#8217;t much of an issue thus far.</li>
<li><strong>Be Aware Of Phishing</strong> &#8211; Never open links in email unless you&#8217;re sure of its origin.  If your bank wants you to login and do something, visit the banks website by going to the site yourself rather than clicking on a suspicious link.  No business will ask you to verify your password.  Microsoft has some more <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/protect/yourself/phishing/identify.mspx">tips</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Use A Secure Browser</strong> &#8211; Firefox 3, IE 7+, Safari 3.2 all offer Phishing protection.  This isn&#8217;t perfect (nothing really is), but it can greatly reduce your chances of being a victim of a phishing attack.  Enough browsers support protection that you shouldn&#8217;t be browsing without it.  Firefox 3 also includes malware protection.  I have a Firefox bias though that doesn&#8217;t mean you can ignore this.  Use a modern browser with phishing protection.</li>
<li><strong>Secure Your Computer</strong> &#8211; If you have a laptop you should have a password when logging in.  If you don&#8217;t, correct this.  It&#8217;s easy to do on <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/winxp/accounts.mspx">Windows</a> or <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1274">Mac OS X</a>.  This will at least stop dumb thieves, which are fairly numerous.  Even if your laptop never leaves your home this is still a good idea.  It&#8217;s not impossible for the cable guy, phone guy, refrigerator repair man, etc. to try and steal something like a laptop.  This is such a small step that can save you some trouble later on.</li>
<li><strong>Secure Your Cell Phone</strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s not going overboard to secure your cell phone.  If you&#8217;re like a growing number of people, your cell phone is a much more complicated device than it was just a few years ago.  It can contain a lot of data including phone numbers, your calendar, photos, browsing history, email, even financial data.  Just this week someone <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/22/2008-11-22_arkansas_man_sues_mcdonalds_over_nude_ph-2.html">sued</a> because they lost their cell phone, which happened to contain nude pictures that they claim were leaked online.  Most phones include the ability to add some form of a password or passcode.  The iPhone even has an option to wipe data after a certain number of unsuccessful attempts.  Securing this compact hard drive isn&#8217;t a bad idea.</li>
<li><strong>Don&#8217;t Put Things Online You May Regret</strong> &#8211; People who do this admittedly deserve what they get.  Posting information regarding your personal lows may work out to your advantage in the future.  Already 1 in 10 college admissions officers check social networking profiles according to <a href="http://www.kaplan.com/aboutkaplan/pressreleases/KaplanCAOSurveyResults.htm">Kaplan</a>.  When I graduated college in 2006 I could tell who actually looked at my job application by looking at the log files for this blog.  All but one or two potential employers went to Google to screen me.  In more than one case I actually used <code>tail -f</code> and watched them (live!) browsing this blog from their corporate network while they screened me over the phone.  Only one actually brought it up in an interview (and he said he was impressed by depth of my technical posts).  That was way back in 2006.  Employers and colleges are much more savvy now.  I get emails from headhunters constantly because of this blog.  Because of this I know it&#8217;s not scaremongering.  People out there really do use the Internet to screen strangers.  This is standard practice, especially if you&#8217;re under 30 (and more likely to have some digital trace online) or if you apply for a tech/internet job. </li>
<li><strong>Backup</strong> &#8211; Backing up is important.  Get an external hard drive and backup all data you care about on a routine basis.  I&#8217;d suggest at least once a week.  I&#8217;d also suggest having some sort of off-site backup for things you wouldn&#8217;t want to loose in the event of a fire or natural disaster (email, financial records, etc.).  You could use online services like Amazon&#8217;s S3, though make sure to use encryption, or the offline method of saving them to a disk and putting that disk either at a parents home, safe deposit box, etc.  Just make sure that disk is either encrypted or in a secure location where it won&#8217;t fall into the wrong hands.  A fireproof safe is another way to go though you&#8217;ll want to make sure you use a UL Class 125 safe rated for at least 1hr.  They can withstand fire and keep the internal climate at no more than 125°F and 80% humidity, suitable for magnetic media.  If it&#8217;s not UL tested make sure it&#8217;s suitable for the media you are trying to store for at least 1hr, preferably more.</li>
</ol>
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2147#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2008/11/0d73a25.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/11/23/how-to-be-more-secure-with-your-data-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AVG Wastes Bandwidth</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/07/03/avg-wastes-bandwidth/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/07/03/avg-wastes-bandwidth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkscanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=1813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AVG really needs to fix their &#8220;LinkScanner&#8221; product. It essentially scans pages for links and pre-downloads them to check for malware. If that doesn&#8217;t sound so bad, then your obviously not paying for bandwidth or trying to keep your server &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/07/03/avg-wastes-bandwidth/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AVG really needs to fix their &#8220;LinkScanner&#8221; product.  It essentially scans pages for links and pre-downloads them to check for malware.  If that doesn&#8217;t sound so bad, then your obviously not paying for bandwidth or trying to keep your server load manageable.  Essentially it means more traffic pegging servers and downloading pages, but most of it being a total waste.  </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t just bad for webmasters.  This excess traffic hogs ISP&#8217;s (who now plan to charge by-the-byte) and WiFi.  In a country where we are <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/06/15/redefining-broadband/">tight on bandwidth</a>, this is really a pretty lousy implementation.</p>
<p>AVG even went so far as to use multiple user agents, all of which <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/26/avg_disguises_fake_traffic_as_ie6/">seem to spoof IE</a>, making it more difficult to block.</p>
<p>The best way to <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/02/linkscanner_fake_traffic_temporary_fix/">block the bogus AVG traffic</a> seem to be by looking for the <code>Accept-Encoding</code> HTTP header, which could be done using an <a href="http://www.pixelbeat.org/docs/web/avg_linkscanner.html">Apache rewrite rule</a> if you can&#8217;t do so on the firewall or load balancer level.</p>
<p>AVG really needs to reaccess this poorly designed product.  It&#8217;s unnecessarily taxing the web.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=1813#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2008/07/f542eae.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/07/03/avg-wastes-bandwidth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Norton AntiVirus With POP3 Over SSL</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stunnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t find this anywhere online, so I thought I&#8217;d post it. Norton AntiVirus up to and including 2007 doesn&#8217;t support POP3 over SSL. That&#8217;s a problem since sending mail without SSL is insecure, and sending mail over SSL with &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t find this anywhere online, so I thought I&#8217;d post it.  Norton AntiVirus up to and including 2007 doesn&#8217;t support POP3 over SSL.  That&#8217;s a problem since sending mail without SSL is insecure, and sending mail over SSL with no virus scanning is also insecure.  There is a fix.</p>
<p><em>Please note these directions, and intended to be a casual guide for experienced individuals.  I&#8217;m not providing assistance or support.</em></p>
<p><span id="more-1272"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Download <a href="http://www.stunnel.org/download/">stunnel</a> and install it.</li>
<li>Open up the <code>stunnel.conf</code> file (either through the Start Menu &#8212;> Stunnel &#8212;> Edit stunnel.conf, or navigate to the file yourself.</li>
<li>For each mail server you use, create an entry as follows.  Replace mail.myisp.com with your mail server.  Also make sure you set the appropriate port (995 is typically fine).  Make sure the accept port is different for each one.
<pre>
client=yes
accept=127.0.0.1:110
connect=mail.myisp.com:995
</pre>
</li>
<li>Start Menu &#8212;> Stunnel &#8212;> Service install</li>
<li>Start Menu &#8212;> Stunnel &#8212;> Service start</li>
<li>Now configure your email client to use the following information:
<pre>
Server: localhost
Port: 110 (or whatever port that account was set to use up above)
</pre>
<p>SSL should be <em>off</em> (the SSL connection is now terminated at stunnel, which uses the local loopback interface to send mail to your mail client on port 110.  So mail is sent over the web in SSL, but locally in plain text (where an AV can sniff it).</p>
</li>
<li>Test it out.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Important Last step</strong></p>
<p>Up to now it should be working, but it&#8217;s using a generic key.  This means everyone who downloads stunnel has the key.  You need your own.  There are good directions for that from <a href="http://www.stunnel.org/faq/certs.html#ToC5">available here</a>.  You can create one with a copy of <a href="http://www.openssl.org/">OpenSSL</a> (it&#8217;s up to you to get it for Windows, or hop on a Unix box for this step).  I should note that the <code>stunnel.cnf</code> file is missing in the Windows binaries as of Stunnel 4.20 (don&#8217;t ask me why).  If your going to gen a key on windows use the following in a text file named <code>stunnel.cnf</code>:</p>
<pre>
# create RSA certs - Server

RANDFILE = stunnel.rnd

[ req ]
default_bits = 1024
encrypt_key = yes
distinguished_name = req_dn
x509_extensions = cert_type

[ req_dn ]
countryName = Country Name (2 letter code)
countryName_default             = PL
countryName_min                 = 2
countryName_max                 = 2

stateOrProvinceName             = State or Province Name (full name)
stateOrProvinceName_default     = Some-State

localityName                    = Locality Name (eg, city)

0.organizationName              = Organization Name (eg, company)
0.organizationName_default      = Stunnel Developers Ltd

organizationalUnitName          = Organizational Unit Name (eg, section)
#organizationalUnitName_default =

0.commonName                    = Common Name (FQDN of your server)
0.commonName_default            = localhost

# To create a certificate for more than one name uncomment:
# 1.commonName                  = DNS alias of your server
# 2.commonName                  = DNS alias of your server
# ...
# See http://home.netscape.com/eng/security/ssl_2.0_certificate.html
# to see how Netscape understands commonName.

[ cert_type ]
nsCertType = server
</pre>
<p><small>This is from the source code of version 4.20.</small></p>
<p>From there you can effectively use the following commands (from the above linkage):</p>
<pre>
openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -nodes -config stunnel.cnf -out stunnel.pem -keyout stunnel.pem
</pre>
<p>Change 365 to something higher if you don&#8217;t want to do this on a yearly basis.  Though may not be a bad idea to do annually.  Answer the prompts as required.  Make sure the Common Name is set to &#8220;localhost&#8221;.</p>
<p>Followed by:</p>
<pre>
openssl gendh 512 >> stunnel.pem
</pre>
<p>Make sure your cert.pem is in your stunnel directory, stop the service and start it again.  From now on you should be good to go.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s it.  Now you have SSL encrypted mail connections, with support for AntiVirus scanning.  This will work for any mail host that uses POP3 over SSL including Gmail.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2007/01/7810ccd.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/01/28/using-norton-antivirus-with-pop3-over-ssl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norton &#8220;Internet Worm Protection&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pptp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vpn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Norton AntiVirus has this strange omission I just can&#8217;t figure out. For some reason &#8220;Internet Worm Protection&#8221; won&#8217;t allow for creating a connection to a PPTP VPN. Not very helpful if you have to connect to one of the many &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norton AntiVirus has this strange omission I just can&#8217;t figure out.  For some reason &#8220;Internet Worm Protection&#8221; won&#8217;t allow for creating a connection to a PPTP VPN.  Not very helpful if you have to connect to one of the many VPN&#8217;s out there that use this protocol.</p>
<p>First a little primer on making a <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314076">PPTP connection</a> .  You essentially need two ports open, 1723/TCP, and IP Protocol 47 (GRE).  Ok, this is pretty basic stuff.  We can do that <img src='http://robert.accettura.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Well in the little wizard Norton provides, to create a rule you have the following choices for protocol: TCP, UDP, TCP/UDP, ICMP, ICMPv6, All (pointless).  No way to select GRE.</p>
<p>So the only way I&#8217;ve found to connect to a PPTP VPN thus far is simply to disable either just Internet Worm Protection, or disable Norton AV.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s rather odd that something like this is not supported.  A search on Google didn&#8217;t turn up an answer.  Symantec&#8217;s tech support database didn&#8217;t turn up anything helpful either.</p>
<p>I would have expected something like this to function without a hitch.  I&#8217;m very surprised to see this requires any intervention, and even more surprised to see that even with intervention there&#8217;s still no way to get it working.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/10/0f2c9a9.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/10/24/norton-internet-worm-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norton AV 2006 Update</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got Norton AntiVirus 2006 a few weeks ago, and decided today to update 3 systems from 2005 to 2006. It was free (after rebate) so a worthwhile update to keep those virus definitions fresh. One computer had trouble uninstalling, &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got Norton AntiVirus 2006 a few weeks ago, and decided today to update 3 systems from 2005 to 2006.  It was free (after rebate) so a worthwhile update to keep those virus definitions fresh.  </p>
<p>One computer had trouble uninstalling, the old version (2005) then installed fine.  The next system had uninstall problems (but seemed to be a bit different), and failed to install on the first attempt.  The third system is literally brand new so no problems (thankfully).</p>
<p>They used to have a &#8220;removal tool&#8221; online you could download.  In the real world we call it uninstall and include it with software, but they don&#8217;t.  Now instead of a download it&#8217;s ActiveX&#8230; just to make the situation suck slightly more.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve pretty much had it with Symantec.  This took 20X longer than it should have.  You know your product has problems when a customer is unsatisfied with free.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/08/2cbca44.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/08/15/norton-av-2006-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Apple Worm?</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/03/16/the-apple-trojan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Norton AntiVirus, Apple&#8217;s own QuickTime.com website may be a threat to the safety of my (and your) computer. I was trying to view the M:i:III Trailer (link below in plain text, so you can think twice before clicking). &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Norton AntiVirus, Apple&#8217;s own QuickTime.com website may be a threat to the safety of my (and your) computer.  I was trying to view the M:i:III Trailer (link below in plain text, so you can think twice before clicking).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure who is at fault.  It&#8217;s either Apple with a contaminated server, or Norton who incorrectly pushed a bad Virus definition file out.  Either way it&#8217;s a bad thing.</p>
<p><a id="p1023" rel="attachment" class="imagelink" href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/apple-integer-overflow/" title="Apple Integer Overflow"><img id="image1023" src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/20060316_norton_qt_applet.png" alt="Apple Integer Overflow" class="centered" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Details: Attempted Intrusion &#8220;Apple Quicktime MOV Integer Overflow&#8221; against your machine was detected and blocked.<br />
Intruder: movies.apple.com(62.153.251.222)(http(80)).<br />
Risk Level: Medium.<br />
Protocol: TCP.<br />
Attacked IP: XXX(192.168.xxx.xxx).<br />
Attacked Port: 2499.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The URL in question is (proceed with caution):</p>
<pre>http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/missionimpossibleiii/large.html</pre>
<p>Anyone want to take a guess who is at fault?  This is with Norton 2005 with 3/15/2006 Definitions.</p>
<p><small><strong>Edit [3/16/2006 10:36PM EST]:</strong> Changed title to accurately represent dialog <strike>trojan</strike> <ins>worm</ins>.  Added Norton Version.</small><br />
<small><strong>Edit [3/17/2006 10:58AM EST]:</strong> Symantec <a href="http://news.com.com/Norton+update+kicks+AOL+users+offline/2100-1002_3-6050786.html?tag=nefd.top">acknowleges a problem with AOL</a> in it&#8217;s latest update.</small><br />
<small><strong>Edit [3/19/2006 5:30PM EST]:</strong> An <a href="http://symantec.com/avcenter/attack_sigs/s21535.html">document about the vulnerability</a> (no mention on this bug), and <a href="https://www-secure.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2006.03.15.html">update documentation</a>.</small>
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/03/16/the-apple-trojan/#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2006/03/021bbc7.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/03/16/the-apple-worm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Symantec Live Update Fun</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/20/symantec-live-update-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/20/symantec-live-update-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live-update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had Norton SystemWorks 2002 for a while, then upgraded AntiVirus to 2004. Worked fine for quite some time. Recently I reformatted my hard drive and reinstalled this duo. Now I&#8217;m getting an error that I Subscription Client Update failed LU1812. &#8230; <a href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/20/symantec-live-update-fun/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had Norton SystemWorks 2002 for a while, then upgraded AntiVirus to 2004.  Worked fine for quite some time.  Recently I reformatted my hard drive and reinstalled this duo.  Now I&#8217;m getting an error that I Subscription Client Update failed LU1812.  I&#8217;ve got no clue why this is happening.  Following Symantec&#8217;s instructions to completely uninstall and reinstall didn&#8217;t work, nor did updating Live Update or any other step they gave.</p>
<p><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/06/20050620_liveupdate.png" alt='Live Update Error' class="centered" /></p>
<p>Curious if anyone else out there ran across this, and if anyone resolved this problem.
<div id="rja_commentCountImage"><a href="http://robert.accettura.com/?p=781#comments"><img src="http://robert.accettura.com/wp-content/commentCount/2005/06/7143d7f.gif" alt="Comment Count" style="border:0;" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/20/symantec-live-update-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

