Comments on: Google Goes HTML5 http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/12/04/google-goes-html5/ Robert Accettura's Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:07:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Robert http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/12/04/google-goes-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-832399 Robert Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:37:52 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=3141#comment-832399 @Ms2ger: Not really. My understanding is the reason why WHATWG choose it became the HTML5 doctype is because it's the simplest doctype that triggers standards mode rendering. @Ms2ger: Not really. My understanding is the reason why WHATWG choose it became the HTML5 doctype is because it’s the simplest doctype that triggers standards mode rendering.

]]> By: Ms2ger http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/12/04/google-goes-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-832199 Ms2ger Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:43:11 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=3141#comment-832199 Am I too cynic in thinking that they're only using it because it's the shortest doctype that triggers standards mode rendering? Am I too cynic in thinking that they’re only using it because it’s the shortest doctype that triggers standards mode rendering?

]]> By: Martin Hassman http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/12/04/google-goes-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-831998 Martin Hassman Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:36:29 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=3141#comment-831998 @Robert No, exactly they said, they expect developers to use rather HTML5 (which is logical), but they said nothing about their suppressing of Gears (alhough some people still reports, that they mean it). @Robert No, exactly they said, they expect developers to use rather HTML5 (which is logical), but they said nothing about their suppressing of Gears (alhough some people still reports, that they mean it).

]]> By: Robert http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/12/04/google-goes-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-831841 Robert Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:24:28 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=3141#comment-831841 @Martin Hassman: They said they are going to maintain it. They are still moving away though. @Martin Hassman: They said they are going to maintain it. They are still moving away though.

]]> By: Martin Hassman http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/12/04/google-goes-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-831840 Martin Hassman Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:23:09 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=3141#comment-831840 Google has HTML5 doctype for several years. BTW "Google moving from Gears" is a mistake. They have corrected it under the original article. Google has HTML5 doctype for several years.

BTW “Google moving from Gears” is a mistake. They have corrected it under the original article.

]]> By: David Boswell http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/12/04/google-goes-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-831785 David Boswell Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:26:55 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=3141#comment-831785 Thanks to Sam, www.mozilla.org was blazing the trail on this doctype adoption. We made that change weeks ago :) Thanks to Sam, http://www.mozilla.org was blazing the trail on this doctype adoption. We made that change weeks ago :)

]]> By: RyanVM http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/12/04/google-goes-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-831776 RyanVM Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:04:21 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=3141#comment-831776 Makes me wonder if there's half a chance that Youtube goes Theora yet. Makes me wonder if there’s half a chance that Youtube goes Theora yet.

]]>