Comments on: Whitehouse.gov Analysis http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/20/whitehousegov-analysis/ Robert Accettura's Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:35:22 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Gary http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/20/whitehousegov-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-610640 Gary Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:28:01 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2422#comment-610640 Hi Robert, Excellent round up of the technologies, I've compiled a similar list on the builtwith blog pre and post inauguration. <a href="http://blog.builtwith.com/index.php/2009/01/21/whitehousegov-tech-post-inauguration/" title="pre and post inauguration" rel="nofollow">You can view the technology round ups here.</a> I've added a link back to your technology findings as well. Thanks, Gary Hi Robert,

Excellent round up of the technologies, I’ve compiled a similar list on the builtwith blog pre and post inauguration. You can view the technology round ups here. I’ve added a link back to your technology findings as well.

Thanks,

Gary

]]> By: Whitehouse.gov Web Technologies Pre and Post Inauguration | The BuiltWith Blog http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/20/whitehousegov-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-610637 Whitehouse.gov Web Technologies Pre and Post Inauguration | The BuiltWith Blog Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:25:50 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2422#comment-610637 [...] site is running and content and as reported by many blogs and news outlets across the world (here, here and [...] [...] site is running and content and as reported by many blogs and news outlets across the world (here, here and [...]

]]> By: Robert http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/20/whitehousegov-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-610239 Robert Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:41:11 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2422#comment-610239 @Samuel Sidler: That's why I said <q>which is not prohibited</q> They are explicitly allowed despite common perception that government websites should not set cookies. It's cookies beyond a session which can track a users behavior that are prohibited. @Samuel Sidler: That’s why I said which is not prohibited They are explicitly allowed despite common perception that government websites should not set cookies. It’s cookies beyond a session which can track a users behavior that are prohibited.

]]> By: Neil T. http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/20/whitehousegov-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-609898 Neil T. Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:28:21 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2422#comment-609898 Technical details aside, the design of the site looks fantastic. Technical details aside, the design of the site looks fantastic.

]]> By: Samuel Sidler http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2009/01/20/whitehousegov-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-609863 Samuel Sidler Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:40:26 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/?p=2422#comment-609863 Err... I'm unclear on your last point. "The website is setting two cookies that I can see which expire at the end of the session..." That refers to a "session cookie". Session cookies are allowed as per Attachment A, Section III(D)(2)(a)(v)(2) subsection (a) of the document you cite. Err… I’m unclear on your last point.

“The website is setting two cookies that I can see which expire at the end of the session…”

That refers to a “session cookie”. Session cookies are allowed as per Attachment A, Section III(D)(2)(a)(v)(2) subsection (a) of the document you cite.

]]>