<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GDI Text Rendering For Safari On Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/25/gdi-text-rendering-for-safari-on-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/25/gdi-text-rendering-for-safari-on-windows/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura's Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Fitchet</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/25/gdi-text-rendering-for-safari-on-windows/#comment-296144</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Fitchet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/03/25/gdi-text-rendering-for-safari-on-windows/#comment-296144</guid>
		<description>The type in Safari on Windows is "Linuxish".

I have no idea ... what is it going to take for Linux desktops to look less "Safari on Windows-ish"??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The type in Safari on Windows is &#8220;Linuxish&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have no idea &#8230; what is it going to take for Linux desktops to look less &#8220;Safari on Windows-ish&#8221;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/25/gdi-text-rendering-for-safari-on-windows/#comment-295817</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/03/25/gdi-text-rendering-for-safari-on-windows/#comment-295817</guid>
		<description>@Gavin Brown: Well that's why I said "looks like".  Secondly, it seems likely as a major criticism is that font rendering is fugly on Windows.  I'm pretty sure Apple wants to address that.  Adding GDI font rendering seems pretty labor intensive to be intended as just an option.

Because of that, I think my suspicion is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gavin Brown: Well that&#8217;s why I said &#8220;looks like&#8221;.  Secondly, it seems likely as a major criticism is that font rendering is fugly on Windows.  I&#8217;m pretty sure Apple wants to address that.  Adding GDI font rendering seems pretty labor intensive to be intended as just an option.</p>
<p>Because of that, I think my suspicion is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Brown</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/25/gdi-text-rendering-for-safari-on-windows/#comment-295806</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/03/25/gdi-text-rendering-for-safari-on-windows/#comment-295806</guid>
		<description>You've made quite a leap by assuming that GDI will become Apple's preferred choice.  Providing the option to use GDI font rendering is quite different than switching to it completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve made quite a leap by assuming that GDI will become Apple&#8217;s preferred choice.  Providing the option to use GDI font rendering is quite different than switching to it completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
