<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accepting Less Than 99.999% Uptime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/02/accepting-less-than-99999-uptime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/02/accepting-less-than-99999-uptime/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura's Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  2 Dec 2008 20:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/02/accepting-less-than-99999-uptime/#comment-520815</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/03/02/accepting-less-than-99999-uptime/#comment-520815</guid>
		<description>@Graham Pattison: Last I checked only POTS require 99.999% uptime by law.  Companies also take their PBX down without fines and FCC troubles (POTS or VoIP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Graham Pattison: Last I checked only POTS require 99.999% uptime by law.  Companies also take their PBX down without fines and <acronym title="Federal Communications Commission">FCC</acronym> troubles (POTS or VoIP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Pattison</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/02/accepting-less-than-99999-uptime/#comment-520473</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Pattison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/03/02/accepting-less-than-99999-uptime/#comment-520473</guid>
		<description>Where did the other "three nines" go?

Verizon  amazingly does state on their web site  (for their home land line business), "over 1 billion calls a day with 99.9% reliability". I think this "marketing" approach has some major holes - It implies over 1 million calls a day have interruptions/issues. 
Whatever happened to the wireline 99.999% mandated  lifeline service requirement.

Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did the other &#8220;three nines&#8221; go?</p>
<p>Verizon  amazingly does state on their web site  (for their home land line business), &#8220;over 1 billion calls a day with 99.9% reliability&#8221;. I think this &#8220;marketing&#8221; approach has some major holes - It implies over 1 million calls a day have interruptions/issues.<br />
Whatever happened to the wireline 99.999% mandated  lifeline service requirement.</p>
<p>Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmdesp</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/03/02/accepting-less-than-99999-uptime/#comment-283880</link>
		<dc:creator>jmdesp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/03/02/accepting-less-than-99999-uptime/#comment-283880</guid>
		<description>Her in France we have a rather large number of VOIP lines, and unfortunately not a great uptime. With the better ISPs the average uptime is not that bad, but when it's down, it's down for a long time.

The end result is it's very strongly recommended to ditch the POTS line only if you have a cellular phone as backup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her in France we have a rather large number of VOIP lines, and unfortunately not a great uptime. With the better ISPs the average uptime is not that bad, but when it&#8217;s down, it&#8217;s down for a long time.</p>
<p>The end result is it&#8217;s very strongly recommended to ditch the POTS line only if you have a cellular phone as backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
