<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Messaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:35:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/comment-page-1/#comment-289181</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/#comment-289181</guid>
		<description>&gt;I believe it also works with Zimbra (can anyone confirm?),
&gt;which is a good start.
It does, more or less. But it is still rather shaky and rather slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I believe it also works with Zimbra (can anyone confirm?),<br />
&gt;which is a good start.<br />
It does, more or less. But it is still rather shaky and rather slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/comment-page-1/#comment-280181</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/#comment-280181</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;/archives/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/#comment-279992&quot;&gt;
Not gonna happen. Facebook is dotcom 2.0 through and through, and no social networking site has an interest in standardising export; walled gardens are the business plan.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is a small change.  Facebook among many others are part of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dataportability.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DataPortability&lt;/a&gt; now.  How much comes out of that is of course subject to speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="/archives/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/#comment-279992"><p>
Not gonna happen. Facebook is dotcom 2.0 through and through, and no social networking site has an interest in standardising export; walled gardens are the business plan.
</p></blockquote>
<p>There is a small change.  Facebook among many others are part of <a href="http://www.dataportability.org/" rel="nofollow">DataPortability</a> now.  How much comes out of that is of course subject to speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/comment-page-1/#comment-279992</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/02/19/mozilla-messaging/#comment-279992</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Google Desktop has proven a good solution for many who need better search with their email client.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Google Desktop has proven a good solution for &lt;i&gt;almost nobody&lt;/i&gt; who needs better search in their mail. If Google Desktop were an adequate way of indexing mail for Thunderbird&#039;s target client base, it&#039;d be an adequate way of indexing web browser history and bookmarks too. Sometimes you simply &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; to reinvent the wheel, and it doesn&#039;t hurt when you&#039;re removing a dependency on proprietary software in the process.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Personally I’d like to see some standard emerge where closed messaging services can essentially be interfaced like an IMAP account.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not gonna happen. Facebook is dotcom 2.0 through and through, and no social networking site has an interest in standardising export; walled gardens are the business plan.

What Thunderbird could really do with is some seriously concentrated workflow examination from some UI experts. The basic interface hasn&#039;t changed much in ten years, and there must be some optimisation that can be made to the most common tasks of the client.

 - Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Google Desktop has proven a good solution for many who need better search with their email client.</p></blockquote>
<p>Google Desktop has proven a good solution for <i>almost nobody</i> who needs better search in their mail. If Google Desktop were an adequate way of indexing mail for Thunderbird&#8217;s target client base, it&#8217;d be an adequate way of indexing web browser history and bookmarks too. Sometimes you simply <i>have</i> to reinvent the wheel, and it doesn&#8217;t hurt when you&#8217;re removing a dependency on proprietary software in the process.</p>
<blockquote><p>Personally I’d like to see some standard emerge where closed messaging services can essentially be interfaced like an IMAP account.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not gonna happen. Facebook is dotcom 2.0 through and through, and no social networking site has an interest in standardising export; walled gardens are the business plan.</p>
<p>What Thunderbird could really do with is some seriously concentrated workflow examination from some UI experts. The basic interface hasn&#8217;t changed much in ten years, and there must be some optimisation that can be made to the most common tasks of the client.</p>
<p> &#8211; Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
