<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silverlight Update System?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/03/silverlight-update-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/03/silverlight-update-system/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichB</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/03/silverlight-update-system/comment-page-1/#comment-248280</link>
		<dc:creator>RichB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/01/03/silverlight-update-system/#comment-248280</guid>
		<description>Silverlight RTM has an automatic update system - in fact, Silverlight 1.0 was updated in November to v1.0.21115:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Silverlight#Versions

You probably didn&#039;t even realize, because the default configuration is for Silverlight to update itself automatically.

In any case, Silverlight&#039;s JS script inserts placeholder HTML into the webpage when the Silverlight control is not installed - at no point does it alert() anything. I think this is probably a usability problem with MSN, rather than Silverlight.

Aside: Be aware that FlashBlock has a bug which prevents Silverlight from showing. You currently need to use the FlashBlock unstable release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silverlight RTM has an automatic update system &#8211; in fact, Silverlight 1.0 was updated in November to v1.0.21115:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Silverlight#Versions" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.....t#Versions</a></p>
<p>You probably didn&#8217;t even realize, because the default configuration is for Silverlight to update itself automatically.</p>
<p>In any case, Silverlight&#8217;s JS script inserts placeholder HTML into the webpage when the Silverlight control is not installed &#8211; at no point does it alert() anything. I think this is probably a usability problem with MSN, rather than Silverlight.</p>
<p>Aside: Be aware that FlashBlock has a bug which prevents Silverlight from showing. You currently need to use the FlashBlock unstable release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kozlowski</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2008/01/03/silverlight-update-system/comment-page-1/#comment-248216</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kozlowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2008/01/03/silverlight-update-system/#comment-248216</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing you&#039;re using beta/CTP code, and this isn&#039;t a &quot;production&quot; message, since production versions don&#039;t expire.  So yeah, inelegant, but beta software isn&#039;t polished, especially the parts that are beta-specific.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;re using beta/CTP code, and this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;production&#8221; message, since production versions don&#8217;t expire.  So yeah, inelegant, but beta software isn&#8217;t polished, especially the parts that are beta-specific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

