<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Illusive Gphone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/11/05/the-illusive-gphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/11/05/the-illusive-gphone/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:10:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian McKellar</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/11/05/the-illusive-gphone/comment-page-1/#comment-214313</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian McKellar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/11/05/the-illusive-gphone/#comment-214313</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It does make me wonder if Google is doing the heavy lifting and carriers will just fork it when done and ship a closed version of the software and take advantage of not needing to pay licensing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, we&#039;re in the same boat with Mozilla. A couple of downstream vendors (Netscape and Joost) have been closed source, but for the most part licensees have remained open (Songbird, Flock, AllPeers, etc). There&#039;s value in the &quot;Open&quot; brand, just like there&#039;s value in the &quot;Apple&quot; brand. I&#039;m hoping there&#039;s enough consumer pressure for carriers to allow open Android devices on their network like they allow open Windows, Palm, Symbian and RIM devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It does make me wonder if Google is doing the heavy lifting and carriers will just fork it when done and ship a closed version of the software and take advantage of not needing to pay licensing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, we&#8217;re in the same boat with Mozilla. A couple of downstream vendors (Netscape and Joost) have been closed source, but for the most part licensees have remained open (Songbird, Flock, AllPeers, etc). There&#8217;s value in the &#8220;Open&#8221; brand, just like there&#8217;s value in the &#8220;Apple&#8221; brand. I&#8217;m hoping there&#8217;s enough consumer pressure for carriers to allow open Android devices on their network like they allow open Windows, Palm, Symbian and RIM devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

