<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD Photo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:25:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Navegabilidad &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Más datos sobre el nuevo formato gráfico de Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-130373</link>
		<dc:creator>Navegabilidad &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Más datos sobre el nuevo formato gráfico de Microsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/03/08/hd-photo/#comment-130373</guid>
		<description>[...] &#187;&#160;noticia original [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#187;&nbsp;noticia original [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porculador</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-126384</link>
		<dc:creator>Porculador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/03/08/hd-photo/#comment-126384</guid>
		<description>Que se lo metan por el culo. La industria, los desarolladores y los usuarios no estamos dispuestos a tolerar &quot;estandares microsoft&quot;, que son formatos cerrados, controlados por una multinacional y con patentes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Que se lo metan por el culo. La industria, los desarolladores y los usuarios no estamos dispuestos a tolerar &#8220;estandares microsoft&#8221;, que son formatos cerrados, controlados por una multinacional y con patentes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meneame.net</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-126227</link>
		<dc:creator>meneame.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/03/08/hd-photo/#comment-126227</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Más datos sobre el nuevo formato gráfico de Microsoft...&lt;/strong&gt;

Se va sabiendo más datos del formato con el que M$ quiere desplazar el uso del JPEG, el Windows Media Photo (aka HD Photo): la licencia, como no podía ser de otra forma, excluye las licencias open-source, con los problemas que puede acarrear a produc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Más datos sobre el nuevo formato gráfico de Microsoft&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Se va sabiendo más datos del formato con el que M$ quiere desplazar el uso del JPEG, el Windows Media Photo (aka HD Photo): la licencia, como no podía ser de otra forma, excluye las licencias open-source, con los problemas que puede acarrear a produc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-126220</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/03/08/hd-photo/#comment-126220</guid>
		<description>Jesse: Thanks.  Fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse: Thanks.  Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-126192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/03/08/hd-photo/#comment-126192</guid>
		<description>The &quot;the comment below&quot; link is https, but this site doesn&#039;t have a valid certificate according to Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;the comment below&#8221; link is https, but this site doesn&#8217;t have a valid certificate according to Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-126158</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/03/08/hd-photo/#comment-126158</guid>
		<description>Bill: thanks for the information, I updated the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill: thanks for the information, I updated the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-126147</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/03/08/hd-photo/#comment-126147</guid>
		<description>Interesting.

&quot;we’re working hard to eliminate every concern we’ve heard addressed that might stand in the way of very broad adoption of HD Photo.&quot;

But without going so far as releasing a finished, open source implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>&#8220;we’re working hard to eliminate every concern we’ve heard addressed that might stand in the way of very broad adoption of HD Photo.&#8221;</p>
<p>But without going so far as releasing a finished, open source implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Crow</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2007/03/08/hd-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-126142</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2007/03/08/hd-photo/#comment-126142</guid>
		<description>The quote above about licensing costs (from my blog) is outdated information.  It&#039;s been updated by more recent blog posts.  HD Photo is licensed royalty-free in all cases.

The HD Photo Device Porting Kit (DPK) provides reference source code that makes it easy for anyone to implement support for the format.  For most of the partners we are working with, starting with a stable, optimized source code implementation is their first choice; it&#039;s the fastest way to implement support for HD Photo for their own device or platform.

You&#039;re right that the DPK doesn&#039;t enable open source development.  You&#039;re using our source code as the starting point which, while royalty-free, is not open source.

That&#039;s why we announced we&#039;re committed to standardization.  Once standardized, the goal is that the appropriate standards organization would then own the format and would publish a full specification.  This would allow developers to create their own implementations independent of working with our source code in the DPK, with the option of releasing their implementation as open source.

In short, we&#039;re working hard to eliminate every concern we&#039;ve heard addressed that might stand in the way of very broad adoption of HD Photo.  We don&#039;t expect any new image file format to become pervasive overnight - this will be an extended process.  However, we&#039;re doing everything we can to eliminate barriers and speed the adoption process.

Bill Crow
HD Photo Program Manager</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote above about licensing costs (from my blog) is outdated information.  It&#8217;s been updated by more recent blog posts.  HD Photo is licensed royalty-free in all cases.</p>
<p>The HD Photo Device Porting Kit (DPK) provides reference source code that makes it easy for anyone to implement support for the format.  For most of the partners we are working with, starting with a stable, optimized source code implementation is their first choice; it&#8217;s the fastest way to implement support for HD Photo for their own device or platform.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that the DPK doesn&#8217;t enable open source development.  You&#8217;re using our source code as the starting point which, while royalty-free, is not open source.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why we announced we&#8217;re committed to standardization.  Once standardized, the goal is that the appropriate standards organization would then own the format and would publish a full specification.  This would allow developers to create their own implementations independent of working with our source code in the DPK, with the option of releasing their implementation as open source.</p>
<p>In short, we&#8217;re working hard to eliminate every concern we&#8217;ve heard addressed that might stand in the way of very broad adoption of HD Photo.  We don&#8217;t expect any new image file format to become pervasive overnight &#8211; this will be an extended process.  However, we&#8217;re doing everything we can to eliminate barriers and speed the adoption process.</p>
<p>Bill Crow<br />
HD Photo Program Manager</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
