<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Sites Bad Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/26/good-sites-bad-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/26/good-sites-bad-design/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:41:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/26/good-sites-bad-design/comment-page-1/#comment-70343</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/26/good-sites-bad-design/#comment-70343</guid>
		<description>Robert.  This is a FANTASTIC distinction. Too often designers let their ego get in the way, and think that design = graphic design, and so they miss the point entirely.   Thanks so much for sharing your view:

The ability to expose usability and functionality of your product in a way the user can grasp with minimal effort is what ultimately is important.

-ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert.  This is a FANTASTIC distinction. Too often designers let their ego get in the way, and think that design = graphic design, and so they miss the point entirely.   Thanks so much for sharing your view:</p>
<p>The ability to expose usability and functionality of your product in a way the user can grasp with minimal effort is what ultimately is important.</p>
<p>-ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/26/good-sites-bad-design/comment-page-1/#comment-38009</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/26/good-sites-bad-design/#comment-38009</guid>
		<description>@Joshua Porter: depends on your definition of design... Some say MySpace, CraigsList, etc. are ugly/bad design... some say they are ugly, but brilliantly designed.

I guess the question is: is design 100% aesthetic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joshua Porter: depends on your definition of design&#8230; Some say MySpace, CraigsList, etc. are ugly/bad design&#8230; some say they are ugly, but brilliantly designed.</p>
<p>I guess the question is: is design 100% aesthetic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Porter</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/26/good-sites-bad-design/comment-page-1/#comment-37914</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/26/good-sites-bad-design/#comment-37914</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;the ability to expose usability and functionality of your product in a way the user can grasp with minimal effort is what ultimately is important.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is this not part of design?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;the ability to expose usability and functionality of your product in a way the user can grasp with minimal effort is what ultimately is important.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Is this not part of design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
