<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura&#039;s Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:10:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-257533</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-257533</guid>
		<description>Type in your web browser  %AppData%  !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Type in your web browser  %AppData%  !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rarestone</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-209983</link>
		<dc:creator>rarestone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-209983</guid>
		<description>This folder is the now the AppData. Click Start, Run, enter AppData and there you will find it, in three subfolders local, locallow and roaming. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This folder is the now the AppData. Click Start, Run, enter AppData and there you will find it, in three subfolders local, locallow and roaming. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-165331</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-165331</guid>
		<description>Brain, I still cannot access my Application Data Folder. If anyone could help, that&#039;d be nice :]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brain, I still cannot access my Application Data Folder. If anyone could help, that&#8217;d be nice :]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scott</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-37404</link>
		<dc:creator>John Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-37404</guid>
		<description>I too am beta testing Vista. I am both a Mac user and Windows user. I think windows has given up trying to patch all the holes in its system. Frankly I dont think that is possible in any OS.So Microsoft has gone the direction of trying to warn users of impending doom if they allow certain changes. Of course this can be anoying! But so can viruses and malware.
Im sure OS X would be doing similar prompts if they had more targets aimed at that OS. My only complaint about Vista is that it is a HD hog.
Talk about a huge OS!! Can we not just build ONE OS Microsoft?? Why do we need choices? Does this not only create problems for Microsoft but for the consumer? People had enough trouble choosing between XP home and Pro. Yes, they later added Media center, but that really only added media type applications which could have been offered as a separate upgrade.
Consumers will only be confused and will probably delay any new OS until they can understand what they really need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am beta testing Vista. I am both a Mac user and Windows user. I think windows has given up trying to patch all the holes in its system. Frankly I dont think that is possible in any OS.So Microsoft has gone the direction of trying to warn users of impending doom if they allow certain changes. Of course this can be anoying! But so can viruses and malware.<br />
Im sure OS X would be doing similar prompts if they had more targets aimed at that OS. My only complaint about Vista is that it is a HD hog.<br />
Talk about a huge OS!! Can we not just build ONE OS Microsoft?? Why do we need choices? Does this not only create problems for Microsoft but for the consumer? People had enough trouble choosing between XP home and Pro. Yes, they later added Media center, but that really only added media type applications which could have been offered as a separate upgrade.<br />
Consumers will only be confused and will probably delay any new OS until they can understand what they really need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-35344</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-35344</guid>
		<description>Wulf: same way the newspapers keep the columns full, spacing is relative to the amount of text in the line.  Can be odd at some times ;-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wulf: same way the newspapers keep the columns full, spacing is relative to the amount of text in the line.  Can be odd at some times <img src='http://robert.accettura.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulf</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-35324</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-35324</guid>
		<description>Lol, I wonder how did I manage that spacing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, I wonder how did I manage that spacing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulf</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-35322</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-35322</guid>
		<description>Whoops, link didn&#039;t show...

Here ya go: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=151250154&amp;size=o&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=151250154&amp;size=o&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, link didn&#8217;t show&#8230;</p>
<p>Here ya go: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=151250154&amp;size=o" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photo_zo.....038;size=o</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wulf</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-35321</link>
		<dc:creator>Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-35321</guid>
		<description>There is a hilarious example of the endless confirmation dialogs over at flickr:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=151250154&amp;size=o&quot; title=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=151250154&amp;size=o&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a hilarious example of the endless confirmation dialogs over at flickr:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=151250154&amp;size=o" title="http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=151250154&amp;size=o" / rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Irelan</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-34862</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Irelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-34862</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to make a note that you &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; get into your Application Data directory, only the name and format were changed.

The folder:
F:\Users\[UserName]\AppData
is split up into 3 subfolders that should house what was in the Application Data folder.

For example, my Firefox cache was in the &#039;Local&#039; directory and my profiles in the &#039;Roaming&#039; directory.

I assume the &#039;Application Data&#039; folder is only there for backwards compatability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to make a note that you <i>can</i> get into your Application Data directory, only the name and format were changed.</p>
<p>The folder:<br />
F:\Users\[UserName]\AppData<br />
is split up into 3 subfolders that should house what was in the Application Data folder.</p>
<p>For example, my Firefox cache was in the &#8216;Local&#8217; directory and my profiles in the &#8216;Roaming&#8217; directory.</p>
<p>I assume the &#8216;Application Data&#8217; folder is only there for backwards compatability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2006/06/09/windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-33437</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 04:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2006/06/09/windows-vista/#comment-33437</guid>
		<description>I had similar feelings that Vista&#039;s going to be a pain in the ass to use with its default security model.  When I installed my company&#039;s software product, I was prompted *three times* before it would let me do the installation.   Later, I needed to edit my config file and couldn&#039;t.  I&#039;m still not sure how to do this.

The security change is so far past the point of usefulness people will likely try to circumvent it.  In contrast, Linux rarely asks for extra access when deleting files or checking system things like IP address.  And when it does need root access, there&#039;s provisions like the &quot;sudo&quot; command -- prompting once.  Similarly, YaST prompts once then runs its updates.  But more to the point, I can use the system without having to repeatedly request privileged access.

The one thing I really liked about Vista was the revamped start menu that let me find a program without hunting around for which group it was in.  

The look and feel is a nice improvement over the bling-feel of XP (which I usually revert to &quot;classic mode&quot;), but dang does it take so much of my system&#039;s resources.

Oh, and I agree with you about Ubuntu.  I&#039;m waiting for my 6.x discs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had similar feelings that Vista&#8217;s going to be a pain in the <abbr title="ass">***</abbr> to use with its default security model.  When I installed my company&#8217;s software product, I was prompted *three times* before it would let me do the installation.   Later, I needed to edit my config file and couldn&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m still not sure how to do this.</p>
<p>The security change is so far past the point of usefulness people will likely try to circumvent it.  In contrast, Linux rarely asks for extra access when deleting files or checking system things like IP address.  And when it does need root access, there&#8217;s provisions like the &#8220;sudo&#8221; command &#8212; prompting once.  Similarly, YaST prompts once then runs its updates.  But more to the point, I can use the system without having to repeatedly request privileged access.</p>
<p>The one thing I really liked about Vista was the revamped start menu that let me find a program without hunting around for which group it was in.  </p>
<p>The look and feel is a nice improvement over the bling-feel of XP (which I usually revert to &#8220;classic mode&#8221;), but dang does it take so much of my system&#8217;s resources.</p>
<p>Oh, and I agree with you about Ubuntu.  I&#8217;m waiting for my 6.x discs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

