<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser-based attacks up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/14/browser-based-attacks-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/14/browser-based-attacks-up/</link>
	<description>Robert Accettura's Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/14/browser-based-attacks-up/#comment-4014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/06/14/browser-based-attacks-up/#comment-4014</guid>
		<description>IE7 + Longhorn seems like it's going to be a more secure platform. They call it the "low rights IE".

I wonder:
- whether this is going to decrease infections due to IE
- if and when will the mozilla products implement similar functionality

Microsoft said they are going to publish information on how to run low rights apps. Let's see how this will happen in practise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 + Longhorn seems like it&#8217;s going to be a more secure platform. They call it the &#8220;low rights <acronym title="Internet Explorer">IE</acronym>&#8221;.</p>
<p>I wonder:<br />
- whether this is going to decrease infections due to <acronym title="Internet Explorer">IE</acronym><br />
- if and when will the mozilla products implement similar functionality</p>
<p>Microsoft said they are going to publish information on how to run low rights apps. Let&#8217;s see how this will happen in practise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martey</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/14/browser-based-attacks-up/#comment-4013</link>
		<dc:creator>Martey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/06/14/browser-based-attacks-up/#comment-4013</guid>
		<description>I think we will continue to see the use of blended threats. Many recent IM worms, for example, have used browser vulnerabilities to automatically download themselves onto computers, with minimum user intervention. After many large organizations started blocking attachments, some email worms sent hyperlinks to downloadable malware, instead.

Also, if use of wireless technologies continue to increase, I would expect an increase in man-in-the-middle attacks involving rogue access points and the like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we will continue to see the use of blended threats. Many recent <acronym title="Instant Message">IM</acronym> worms, for example, have used browser vulnerabilities to automatically download themselves onto computers, with minimum user intervention. After many large organizations started blocking attachments, some email worms sent hyperlinks to downloadable malware, instead.</p>
<p>Also, if use of wireless technologies continue to increase, I would expect an increase in man-in-the-middle attacks involving rogue access points and the like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/06/14/browser-based-attacks-up/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 06:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/06/14/browser-based-attacks-up/#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>What next?

Downloads again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What next?</p>
<p>Downloads again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
