Comments on: Don’t make browsers, make extensions http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/ Robert Accettura's Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:27:24 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: xslf.com http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-3511 xslf.com Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:08:19 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/#comment-3511 מקבץ בלוגי×?דת דפדפני×? (וג×? קצת בוץ)

פכי×? קטני×? הקשורי×? לדפדפני×?, בעיקר מתוך בלוגי×? בנוש×?. פיירפוקס 1.0.3 עברי לחלונות- גירסת התיקון הזו נשלחה (בעיכוב) לשרת של מוזילה. למי שממהר, ×…

]]> By: Daniel Glazman http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-3503 Daniel Glazman Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:11:09 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/#comment-3503 Robert, let's push this a bit further: the future of open-source development is probably a model where the "basic" kernel is free, and is usually enough for 80% of the users, while some extensions bringing a real plus to the 20% others are commercial.That's almost the only way for OSS companies to avoid being an almost pure contracting company. Robert, let’s push this a bit further: the future of open-source development is probably a model where the “basic” kernel is free, and is usually enough for 80% of the users, while some extensions bringing a real plus to the 20% others are commercial.That’s almost the only way for OSS companies to avoid being an almost pure contracting company.

]]> By: Gemal's Psyched Blog http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-3502 Gemal's Psyched Blog Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:39:23 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/#comment-3502 Don't make browsers, make extensions I have to agree completly with Robert Accettura on this: There's been a ton of speculation regarding "gbrowser", google's alleged browser, Netscape's Firefox based browser, now even thoughts Yahoo might be interested. Though I wonder if that reall... Don’t make browsers, make extensions

I have to agree completly with Robert Accettura on this: There’s been a ton of speculation regarding “gbrowser”, google’s alleged browser, Netscape’s Firefox based browser, now even thoughts Yahoo might be interested. Though I wonder if that reall…

]]> By: Robert http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-2471 Robert Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:12:23 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/#comment-2471 Fixed Fixed

]]> By: another anonymous speller http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-2360 another anonymous speller Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:50:41 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/#comment-2360 ... and "insignificant". … and “insignificant”.

]]> By: Anonymous Speller http://robert.accettura.com/blog/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-2358 Anonymous Speller Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:15:38 +0000 http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/02/10/dont-make-browsers-make-extensions/#comment-2358 Please, please learn to spell "lose"! Please, please learn to spell “lose”!

]]>